Ring Ratings At Welterweight Are Disgustingly Bad

[Hougigo]

Ahh, my bad see what you meant now.

No prob man.... but it'll be a year plus since he fought at WW with no sign of fighting there since Khan got beat.
Actually... he might fight Guerrero

[ИATAS]

Pacman is still #1?? Never unifying, only beating 1 realistically ranked champion with stipulations. Arguably losing to Marquez, officially losing to Bradley? Bradley lower than Paulie & Brook, even though Brook has yet to fight on the championship level? LOL, wow.

clearly the ring isn't recognizing his "loss" to bradley (thus why bradley is only #6 and not top 2).

But with that said I think floyd should clearly be #1 and Pac #2.

[Frank Ducketts]

Pacquiao IS number 1 at 151 and 145 lbs though.

[Bushbaby]

clearly the ring isn't recognizing his "loss" to bradley (thus why bradley is only #6 and not top 2).

But with that said I think floyd should clearly be #1 and Pac #2.

I understand them not wanting to recognize it, but still doesn't account for Pacman's 2 suspect performances in a row. Didn't mention Floyd cause it goes without saying, automatic so to speak.

[ИATAS]

I understand them not wanting to recognize it, but still doesn't account for Pacman's 2 suspect performances in a row. Didn't mention Floyd cause it goes without saying, automatic so to speak.

I'm just trying to rationalize their logic behind the ratings. Maybe cuz floyd hasn't fought a WW in a long while he's #2, and pac is there by default I guess. All I know is it should be Floyd, then Pac. No one else deserves to be in the top 2, despite pac having two suspect performances in a row (imo he beat bradley clean & clear, nothing suspect about it, JMM different story though).

[DefThatGuy]

Kell Brook ranked 3rd LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

[Bushbaby]

I'm just trying to rationalize their logic behind the ratings. Maybe cuz floyd hasn't fought a WW in a long while he's #2, and pac is there by default I guess. All I know is it should be Floyd, then Pac. No one else deserves to be in the top 2, despite pac having two suspect performances in a row (imo he beat bradley clean & clear, nothing suspect about it, JMM different story though).

I think he beat Bradley too. But the fight was still controversial regardless. But if they are going to apply that logic to Bradley, why won't they apply it to Marquez?? I still don't see how Paulie & Brook can be ranked over Bradley either.

[DeadLikeMe]

They're a little bit off, not horrible though...

[ИATAS]

I think he beat Bradley too. But the fight was still controversial regardless. But if they are going to apply that logic to Bradley, why won't they apply it to Marquez?? I still don't see how Paulie & Brook can be ranked over Bradley either.

well imo, and I'm guessing this is the rings opinion too, but bradley-pac was not a close fight. It was obvious to 99% of everyone that pac should have won. Pac vs JMM was pretty damn close. (For example if we look at the press scoring, boxrec documents 120 scores for pac, 1 for bradley and one draw. Whereas boxrec has 57 scored for JMM and 51 for Pac.)

[paulf]

01. Mayweather
02. Bradley
03. Pacquiao
04. Malignaggi
05. Guerrero
06. Berto
07. Brook
08. Zavec
09. Alexander
10. Bailey

....in my humble opinion