And the butthurt raged on for weeks
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley: I Never Said I Lost! Why Would I Say That?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by D4thincarnation View PostWhen I see the judges getting it 5+ rounds out from my card, it is a robbery IMO, no excuse for being that far out.
The Maywether vs Castillo fight was that far out, which could suggest foul play at hand.
JMM vs Pacquiao could have been 115-113 either way the judges cards were not that far out from what the unofficial cards thought.
You are just all over the place. Face it dude, you only think its a robbery because manny lost. If manny had won like Tim did, you wouldn't give a ****.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by The Weebler II View PostYou didn't have to say you lost Timmy, your body language said it all for you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by charlieg View PostPerhaps when he was dazed from being buzzed by left hands, in those moments in his imagination he was giving Pacquiao a boxing lesson.
The rest of the time he was throwing hopeful shots and waiting until the next time he got smacked upside down.
Of course, if dropping your jab short and throwing the right into somebody's guard is giving a boxing lesson, then I guess the new way to win fights is to get beat up and punch at thin air.
....and the new wheelchairweight of the world!
This is funny as hell
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Dunn View Postso now you change your definition of a robbery. Also, you said manny clearly won the third jmm fight, now you are saying it could've been 115-113 either way.
You are just all over the place. Face it dude, you only think its a robbery because manny lost. If manny had won like Tim did, you wouldn't give a ****.
Castillo beat Mayweather by 3/4 rounds but the judges gave it to Mayweather by 4/5 rounds, that is an 8 round swing, that quite a bit, not as much as the Pacquiao vs Bradley fight, which was an 10-12 round swing on two cards though.
Comment
Comment