Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chris Byrd vs Vitali Klitschko (Highlights)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
    Chris Byrd was better, P4P, than Vitali.
    Not only better p4p, but a better Heavyweight, period.

    He won the H2H matchup, plus he's beaten more quality opponents at Heavyweight.

    Originally posted by edgarg View Post
    I always have liked Byrd, great feints and footwork. But he was overmatched against Klitschko.
    Which Klitschko? Wlad, yes. Vitali is a notch on Byrd's resume.


    Originally posted by Toney Loc View Post
    I love Chris Byrd. He was really slick in this fight BUT...he also got hit ALOT.
    Vitali beat the living fuck out of Byrd's gloves.


    Originally posted by SCtrojansbaby View Post
    Is this a serious thread? The fight wasn't even very competitive Byrd lost almost every round. Cuz boxrec sez so.
    Last edited by -Deal With It-; 01-20-2012, 03:11 AM.

    Comment


      #22
      chris byrd eradicated vitali klitschkos rotator cuff and rubbed his dick on vitali's wife afterwards.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by jesusraptor View Post
        chris byrd eradicated vitali klitschkos rotator cuff and rubbed his dick on vitali's wife afterwards.
        sig'd

        Comment


          #24
          byrd making vitali quit is like malignaggi making pacquiao quit. all time greats don't surrender and let their brothers fight their conqueror. well there was that one time fred louis ko'd max schmelling but besides that...

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by -Deal With It- View Post
            Try 4 or 5.
            Try Byrd losing heavily on all scorecards.

            Originally posted by daggum View Post
            there are no good boxers at heavyweight because they are all overweight blimps
            Here's a fat, overweight blimp on Vitali's record:

            Comment


              #26
              Wvald was better at handling boxers like Byrd. Vitali was better at handling the brawlers like Peter.

              Chris didnt have the power to keep the big guys from walking through his shots but he had enough speed and reflexes to cause teh older slower brother trouble. He was losing the rounds but getting through them. In the 2nd Wvlad fight Byrd got a beating which wasnt common. Overall I'd say both Klitschkos are better but Vitali should have tried to avenge that defeat

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by edgarg View Post
                I always have liked Byrd, great feints and footwork. But he was overmatched against Klitschko. Klitschko usually forced himm to retreat to the ropes and caught him quite a few times, although Byrd's elusive body movement made him miss a bit. Byrd was not disgraced, but Klitschko was winning wach round by a big margin.

                Klit won most of the rounds, not many would argue against that. But the rounds were very close and Byrd was backing Vitaly up nearly as much as he got backed up despite the huge disadvantages he was at.

                Scoring criteria is based on

                1. Clean punches
                2. Effective aggression
                3. Ring generalship
                4. Defense

                Vitaly landed 8 more punches thru the entire fight and obviously landed the harder punches of the two. Slight advantage to Vitaly in Category one.

                While Vitaly only landed 26% of his total punches but he threw nearly twice as many keeping Byrd on the defensive. When Byrd did throw though he landed at 44%, but overall not active enough to win the effective aggression category. Advantage Klitschko.

                Byrd moved and did as he pleased either standing in front of Klit or moving out of danger without the ring being cutoff on him and was the more apt of the two to give angles. Vitaly on the other hand was content to move in straight lines both offensively and defensively. Advantage Byrd in ring generalship.

                Byrd blocked, ducked and slipped punches making Vitaly land at a career low connect rate and was never visibly hurt in this fight. Advantage Byrd in the defensive category.

                Depending on what one prefers, if you favored a defensive fight, an argument could be made Byrd actually won. Myself, I prefer the guy throwing punches looking to make something happen offensively therefore had Vitaly winning the majority of rounds. Anyone trying to claim the rounds weren't close based on the criteria of judging a fight is just foolish though and only choosing to see what the want to see instead of everything that was happening.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Toney Loc View Post
                  This fight shouldn't be considered when discussing a Vitali-Ali fantasy fight. Byrd and Ali fight NOTHING alike.
                  I agree. Ali was better almost everything.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by SCtrojansbaby View Post
                    Is this a serious thread? The fight wasn't even very competitive Byrd lost almost every round.

                    Says the guy who thinks Pernell Whitaker lost to both Jose Luis Ramirez and Julio Cesar Chavez.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Superflo777 View Post
                      Try Byrd losing heavily on all scorecards.
                      It's called a robbery, pal. They exist in boxing. It was either that, or incompetent judging. But i lean towards it being the former than the latter considering the match took place in Germany.

                      BTW, before Vitali threw in the towel, him and his cornerman said themselves that they thought they might be behind on the scorecards, at least they understand how to properly score a fight.


                      Here's a fat, overweight blimp on Vitali's record:

                      A tomato can, is a tomato can, is a tomato can.

                      But congratulations on finding the lone 1 out of 43 tomato cans on his resume that was actually in semi-decent shape.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP