Floyd by decision against anybody in history

[Mr.0pal]

A lot of people talk a bunch of ish about how this guy would have beat Floyd or that guy. Personally, I highly doubt that these same people, behind closed doors, would put a large amount of money where their mouth is.

I don't care who you mention at 147, 140, 135 or 130 (which ever version of Floyd we're dealing with), if I had a full years income on the line the safest bet I'd chose is Floyd by decision against any fighter in history.

So if you make $40k/yr and you bet against Floyd then you'd work a full year with no pay. If Floyd wins you get a $40,000 check. If you ask me, Floyd is the safest bet against anybody.

Who else would you bet your money on and why? You HAVE to bet on somebody.

[jrosales13]

Threads like this proves how overrated Floyd is...And, if he retires undefeated years later it would be so much worse.

[Mr.0pal]

Threads like this proves how overrated Floyd is...And, if he retires undefeated years later it would be so much worse.

..........

[Vadrigar.]

Threads like this proves how overrated Floyd is...And, if he retires undefeated years later it would be so much worse.

You're right. Floyd wouldn't look so amazing in a strong era.

[Telepath]

Thomas Hearns.

I'd bet every cent I own.

[Mr.0pal]

TS,

Would you put a large amount of money where your mouth is?

This question is being presented as mandatory... sort of a gun to your head type question.... you HAVE to place your money on somebody. Who else other than Floyd would you bet on and why?

Again... I would bet on Floyd against anybody.

[Mr. Invincible]

A lot of people talk a bunch of ish about how this guy would have beat Floyd or that guy. Personally, I highly doubt that these same people, behind closed doors, would put a large amount of money where their mouth is.

I don't care who you mention at 147, 140, 135 or 130 (which ever version of Floyd we're dealing with), if I had a full years income on the line the safest bet I'd chose is Floyd by decision against any fighter in history.

So if you make $40k/yr and you bet against Floyd then you'd work a full year with no pay. If Floyd wins you get a $40,000 check. If you ask me, Floyd is the safest bet against anybody.

Who else would you bet your money on and why?

How about against a prime JL Castillo?

[sugersean15]

people don't relies boxing is changing nobody in sugarraysrobenson time fought like floyd boxing evolves just like every thing else because of trainers rules judges money you wont find a fighter that fought like floyd 100 years ago and floyd would give and past fighter problems in 40 years from now people will say none of the current fighters could beat floyd

[hugh grant]

The fact that Castillo was robbed against FLoyd makes this particular thread hard to digest. Sure, Floyd wins against anyone in history if he can garantuee the refs give him gift decisions.

But if DLH can take Floyd to split decsion any fighter better than DLH can beat Floyd on points. The fact that it shouldnt have been so close is irrelevant. Floyd can lose on points and he can get ko'ed.

[Mr.0pal]

Thomas Hearns.

I'd bet every cent I own.

That's what most people say. I personally would not do that. Watch him against SRL again and see how often SRL was able to make him miss. I wouldn't trust it. Too much money on the line.