Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Decisions Marquez, Highly Controversial

[jessica@rhboxin]

hypo would love for you to backup your talk with some facts.. manny was countered, handed his ass at bay, and couldnt land any shots because of marquez's defense.. and where the **** was manny's boxing ability tonight? he was schooled.. please inform us "morons" with wtf u saw.

[PinoyZoi]

I don't see the robbery, it wasn't obvious their was a clear winner at all. So what's this robbery you guys keep talking about it?

[Mayabang]

lol. close fight could have gone either way depending on if you like agression or accuracy. stop whining, you sound like JMM.

Exactly this. I don't know why people here are *****in. It was a great close fight that could've gotten either way. And people who are so confident that Marquez CLEARLY won are crazy...seriously? Clearly won?

[Stl_Buay]

Pacquiao won fair and square some might be lead to believe Marquez won because the rounds he won he dominated. But, the close rounds go to the aggressive harder puncher. That's boxing... People thought that Pac would run through Marquez so anything short of that looks like he was losing, I actually thought that Pac did better this fight and so did the judges. Look at his face after the first two fights and look at his face tonight, minus the headbutt cut... Yet look at Marquez's face after the fight and then look at the punch stats and then ask who was more aggressive and who did the most damage??? I had it 116 - 112 Pac, and like Emanuel Stewart said go take the title!!! Don't fight a defensive counter-punch fight and then cry when the agressive fighter who threw more punches and landed more punches and Fed your face up gets the W... Pac won and it wasn't pretty but when the fight was a draw after 8 rounds (4-4) Marquez got hit and a little winded and lost any intrest in trying to win the fight outright and taking it out of the judges hands... Message to Marquez and all his cry baby fans... IF YOU FELT YOU WERE ROBBED IN THE FIRST TWO FIGHTS..... GO FOR THE KNOCKOUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But, I don't blame him for not doing so because I saw him take some good shots but don't complain after the fight. Just say I wanted to win but I wasn't going to lay it all on the line and go for the KO because I knew that if I did that I would have to take risk and I wasn't willing to take risk like that against Pac and looking at his face after the fight nobody would blame him for saying that.... Pac looked vulnerable in this fight lets hope that Floyd would be willing to fight now but I doubt it....

[Swazye510]

I thought pacquiao won the statistic speaks for itself 170 to 130 PAC won more rounds

[SplitSecond]

hypo would love for you to backup your talk with some facts.. manny was countered, handed his ass at bay, and couldnt land any shots because of marquez's defense.. and where the **** was manny's boxing ability tonight? he was schooled.. please inform us "morons" with wtf u saw.

i thought his boxing was damn good and i was impressed, he landed the right counter hook plenty of times marquez was just the better boxer and had the advantage of being the pure boxer due to being on the backfoot and peddaling

how do you think pacquiao could have boxed better? i dont think you know boxing

[spoonwars]

hypo would love for you to backup your talk with some facts.. manny was countered, handed his ass at bay, and couldnt land any shots because of marquez's defense.. and where the **** was manny's boxing ability tonight? he was schooled.. please inform us "morons" with wtf u saw.

They both had their good moments. It was not one-sided, therefore not a robbery. It was a close fight. These guys are nearly evenly matched in their fighting styles.

[Pudgemeister]

So many rounds were so close that to call it a robbery is showing some sort of bias towards favoring JMM's defensiveness. Pac was the agressor, pushed the fight the entire time, and landed lots of quick shots.

Not a robbery, ****tards.

[LeadUppercut]

These guys could fight 1000 times at 5 different weights and the result will always be the same- controversy. They are yin and yang, the antithesis of one another. IMO fight could've gone either way, I had Pac eeking out the decision but I won't begrudge anyone who scored it for Marquez.

Just thought it was very odd that Pac allowed Marquez to control the distance and the pace of the fight. The whole time I was yelling for him (Manny) to slide to his left (Marquez's right) and lead with the left. I honestly can't say I saw anything that resembled a game plan from Manny's side, just seemed they figured they would overwhelm JMM with speed and power and JMM would be bloated and move like he was stuck in cement. But Juan Manuel fought brilliantly and he controlled the pace, kept his distance, and even when they exchanged he held his own.

Nothing but respect for the warrior Marquez, but Freddie Roach should be ashamed of himself for allowing that to happen.

Well, havent you turned into a fkn genius then ?

Because, I have been telling you that for MONTHS !!

That is why Pacquiao " conceded " a " catch-weight " that he cannot even make himself.

Can you imagine what would have happened if that fight was held at Manny's best weight, 140?

They thought that Marquez had faded, and that he couldnt handle welter, just like Doug Fischer stated in this article that I have shown you on at least two occasions.....

" However, this fight only makes sense to me if it takes place at junior welterweight (and I would hope Marquez would weigh-in under 140 pounds). Why Pacquiao and company refuse to even consider fighting Marquez at 140 pounds (instead of the 144 or 147 they stipulate) is a very good question. The answer is obvious: they want every conceivable advantage against their aging but still-dangerous nemesis "

Two words..... EXPOSED, and AGAIN !!

[vacon04]

I thought pacquiao won the statistic speaks for itself 170 to 130 PAC won more rounds

Statistics and punching numbers don't say who won more rounds...