Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao more accurate puncher than Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    He cant count the jab because the jab isnt one of Paq's main weapon...lol, I feel sorry for Ike Quartey then..

    Comment


      pac fans trying so hard yet still fail. They dont count the jab, and on top of that, look at Mannys opponents. Did you ever think he did better against them because floyd doesnt fight fighters that are shot to shreds? Floyd fought better versions of ODLH, Ricky Hatton, and Shane Mosley. That is pretty much a fact, yet im sure pac fans will say otherwise. Yet the stats are still pretty much equal, despite all the bias for Pac, which really tells you something...

      Comment


        Originally posted by Ray* View Post
        He cant count the jab because the jab isnt one of Paq's main weapon...lol, I feel sorry for Ike Quartey then..
        The jab is fundamental.........the most important punch in boxing. It helps set everything else up. If pacquiao has a ****y jab it's his own weakness, whereas it's mayweathers strength.

        how can you discount this?



        *******s......smh
        Last edited by Vadrigar.; 07-23-2011, 01:13 PM.

        Comment


          this is a Pac dominated board, so you know when Floyd wins a poll by 70%, the TS failed hard, cuz not even *******s can agree with this nonsense. end thread

          Comment


            Originally posted by -D33Pwaters- View Post
            The jab is fundamental.........the most important punch in boxing. It helps set everything else up. If pacquiao has a ****y jab it's his own weakness, whereas it's mayweathers strength.

            how can you discount this?



            *******s......smh
            You can discount anything to make up a point, at least we still have Paq fans that told him he was wrong..

            Originally posted by LBJ2010 View Post
            this is a Pac dominated board, so you know when Floyd wins a poll by 70%, the TS failed hard, cuz not even *******s can agree with this nonsense. end thread
            It shows they have common-sense and they arent as bad as they are perceived, i didnt even bother voting because there is zero point in voting.

            Comment


              *******s reading the thread...

              Comment


                [IMG]//i955.***********.com/albums/ae34/mcbsouth/fatguyscopy.jpg[/IMG]

                Comment


                  Once more, here are the stats from both fighters' last two fights that lasted for 12 rounds (Floyd's fights before Marquez was almost 4 years ago and earlier, which might make them misleading as a guage):

                  Floyd: Total punches = 498/970 = 51%
                  Jabs: 270/526 = 51% = 11.25/rd.
                  Power punches: 228/444 = 51% = 9.5/rd.

                  Pac: Total punches 698/1796 = 39%
                  Jabs: 110/730 = 15% = 4.6/rd.
                  Power punches: 588/1066 = 55% = 24.5/rd.

                  Based on these stats, Floyd is definitely the more accurate puncher. But does that mean he is the more effective and better boxer? Once you go into the details, it becomes clear that this is not the case. He throws more accurate jabs and lands an average of 6.5 more per round than Pac. Jabs can increase a boxers stats on punches landed, but as an offensive weapon, it pales in comparison with power punches.

                  On the other hand, Pac's jabs land at a measly 4.6 per round, pulling his average down to 39%. But when you separate his power punches from his total output, his accuracy shoots up considerably. Pac's power punches land at an average of 55%. That is higher than Floyd's 51%. Plus, he lands them at an average of 24.5 per round. That is 15 more than Floyd's total power punches per round. These figures show the big difference in their offensive skills.

                  Now, to the question as to who is the more effective boxer, you just have to ask yourself; if you have a choice, which fighter would you rather face?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by tatangb45 View Post
                    Once more, here are the stats from both fighters' last two fights that lasted for 12 rounds (Floyd's fights before Marquez was almost 4 years ago and earlier, which might make them misleading as a guage):

                    Floyd: Total punches = 498/970 = 51%
                    Jabs: 270/526 = 51% = 11.25/rd.
                    Power punches: 228/444 = 51% = 9.5/rd.

                    Pac: Total punches 698/1796 = 39%
                    Jabs: 110/730 = 15% = 4.6/rd.
                    Power punches: 588/1066 = 55% = 24.5/rd.

                    Based on these stats, Floyd is definitely the more accurate puncher. But does that mean he is the more effective and better boxer? Once you go into the details, it becomes clear that this is not the case. He throws more accurate jabs and lands an average of 6.5 more per round than Pac. Jabs can increase a boxers stats on punches landed, but as an offensive weapon, it pales in comparison with power punches.

                    On the other hand, Pac's jabs land at a measly 4.6 per round, pulling his average down to 39%. But when you separate his power punches from his total output, his accuracy shoots up considerably. Pac's power punches land at an average of 55%. That is higher than Floyd's 51%. Plus, he lands them at an average of 24.5 per round. That is 15 more than Floyd's total power punches per round. These figures show the big difference in their offensive skills.

                    Now, to the question as to who is the more effective boxer, you just have to ask yourself; if you have a choice, which fighter would you rather face?
                    yes....

                    end Thread/////////////////

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by skillswin View Post
                      yes....

                      end Thread/////////////////
                      Don't be a cherry picker. Read the whole post and learn.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP