most boxing experts had marquez winning both...since when are kds considered a factor when the fighter comes back and wins almost every other round.and the second fight just proves how retarted judges really are nowadays
Why cause i don't reach your conclusion, I love this fight and have watched it often, to be honest it sounds like you who aren't watching this fight objectively.
You said way back right?
Watch it round by round and score it objectively.
i already told you the rounds why dont you check it out mate.
most boxing experts had marquez winning both...since when are kds considered a factor when the fighter comes back and wins almost every other round.and the second fight just proves how retarted judges really are nowadays
Judges are only ******ed when your fighter lose..
and not most boxing experts had marquesz winning the fight.. it was around 50/50 with the boxing world..
most boxing experts had marquez winning both...since when are kds considered a factor when the fighter comes back and wins almost every other round.and the second fight just proves how retarted judges really are nowadays
I scored the first fight by two point to JMM at the time, and the second fight by a point, I seem to remember feeling sorry and admiring the way JMM cameback after three knockdown in the first round but the second fight was a bit closer than the first.
Comment