Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If you're son was fighting a fighter accused of PED's would you oppose OSDT's?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #31
    Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
    Are we really doing these "what if" threads now? really??
    What IF Manny took the tests....and beat Floyd fair and square?



    Sorry P.W...could'nt help myself

    Comment

      #32
      IF any of my fighters, son/close friend/newphew etc....had the skills of a Floyd Jr...I would advise him to take on all and any fighters, regardless of what they have been accused of/ tested positive for. Why...becuase if I have that much confidence in my fighter, and I have full knowledge of what these PEDs can/should do, and weigh that against what I have seen in fighters who have tested positive for "banned substances".....then I would have the utmost confidence in knowing that they DON'T DO **** FOR YOU.....

      Comment

        #33
        If I thought the opponent was easier work I wouldn't even accuse my son's opponent of PEDs... that's weaksauce

        Comment

          #34
          What is the purpose of this thread?

          Floyd sr was the one who accused him, you spastic!

          Comment

            #35
            Originally posted by Fanny Packiao View Post
            dude, im just asking...if you were the father of a fighter, and your son(fighter) was gonna take a fight with someone who was accused of PED's would you allow your son to fight him?

            First I would make sure I had some actual evidence for fear of looking like a fool later. Next I would make sure that if I did ask for any tests I would do it in a professional manner and not in a "you either take my test or you are a cheater" kind of way. People may find it easier to get someone to meet your requirments when you ask them instead of trying to manipulate them.

            Comment

              #36
              Originally posted by fightfan_79 View Post
              What IF Manny took the tests....and beat Floyd fair and square?



              Sorry P.W...could'nt help myself
              Oh and I'm all for that but again when you try to manipulate some one don't be suprised if they don't go along with it.


              From what I understand people don't like it when you "manipulate" them but they do seem very receptive when you ask professionally.

              Comment

                #37
                Originally posted by Fanny Packiao View Post
                no, in this scenario.....your son is just a fighter and the guy he is going to fight has been accused of PED's......
                I don't get the point. The accuser is the father. He's the one who
                ignited this PED demand. So why oppose something you started?
                I'm lost. Care to clarify your post?

                Comment

                  #38
                  yeah . i mean the only one accusing him is floyd snr ...

                  they should make the tests after the fight or forget about it
                  the fight will never happen ...

                  whats the point of having pacquiao fight at a disadvantage
                  since mayweather found out about pacquiaos phobia of
                  blood tests before a fight (erik morales fight)

                  its atually better to have the fight right after the test

                  Comment

                    #39
                    i maen the test right after the fight rotfl

                    Comment

                      #40
                      If you're son was fighting a fighter you accused of PED's without physical proof who you think can't hold your son's jocks would you oppose OSDT's

                      There, I fixed it for you. Now discuss.
                      Last edited by myCoCainE; 05-06-2010, 05:36 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP