Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was Dirrell-Froch the biggest robbery of 2009?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Dirrel runned and hold a lot in the fight, but the fact is that Froch landed 5 punches in the fight and won nothing more than 5 rounds.
    I had 115-112 for Dirrel.

    Comment


      #82
      I never scored it but I thought Dirrell clearly won...even though he was runnin laps around the ring...

      I think Malignaggi clearly beat Diaz the first time as well...

      Comment


        #83
        By far the biggest robbery of 2009 IMO. Dirrell outboxed him, Froch was hitting air all night.

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by gambleer View Post
          Dirrel runned and hold a lot in the fight, but the fact is that Froch landed 5 punches in the fight and won nothing more than 5 rounds.
          I had 115-112 for Dirrel.
          dirrell was hardly landing that many punches himself, but saying that the few he did land were cleaner than carls in my opinion.

          Comment


            #85
            Dirrell beat the hell out of him.

            Comment


              #86
              Biggest robbery of 2009 was Funeka-Guzman

              Comment


                #87
                No,that would be Martinez-Cintron.

                But Dirrell did win that fight.

                Comment


                  #88
                  Hey, everyone who thought Froch edged it. Explain this please.

                  Comment


                    #89
                    Originally posted by donkim View Post
                    There were three awful decisions that stood out last year.Martinez vs Cintron,funeka vs Guzman and froch vs Dirrell.


                    You will never hear a convincing argument as to how froch somehow deserved the decision because it's impossible to make without sounding like a moron.


                    Have you noticed how the froch apologists will only point to Dirrell's "negative" style and what he did wrong rather than what froch himself did right?


                    Anyody who can score a fight(and it's not difficult) would have scored it in Dirrell's favour by a wide margin due to Dirrell's clean effective punching.



                    froch was not an effective aggressor and he was not throwing or landing clean effective punches.






                    You have no clue what you're talking about.Had Malignaggi not acted like a crybaby,and had the scorecards not been so ridiculously wide,you would never have had the nerve to have claimed that fight to have been a robbery.



                    Please do tell us how many and which rounds Malignaggi won and how he won this fight so decisively






                    Why should he have? He outboxed froch throughout the entire fight throwing and landing the far cleaner,more effective punches.



                    Quite amazing that anyone would have the nerve to claim that the Dirrell-froch fight was just while completely discrediting Juan Diaz's effort in which he did actually land punches
                    I cant agree anymore... i cant recall one clean punch from crotch the whole entire fight, yeah dirrell was on a bike but he was hitting crotch everytime he got close... dirrell is a future superstar imo even though Im biased because he is one of my favs

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Funeka vs Guzman

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP