...legitimate is the keyword here *******s. If he has nothing to hide, there should be no problem with random drug testing. Period.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
*******S: Give me ONE legitimate reason why Pacquiao shouldn't be tested.
Collapse
-
Tags: blood, boxing, dracula, floyd, hgh, idiot, legitimate, mayweather, olympic, pacquiao, pacquiao-is-on-steroids, pactards:, samuraiisanidiot, steroids, vampire
-
Originally posted by TheGreatShark View Post...legitimate is the keyword here *******s. If he has nothing to hide, there should be no problem with random drug testing. Period.
pacs team agreed to testing after the fight and before 48 hours of thfight
why the need for random testing? this is to harass pacquiao plain and simple
Comment
-
i dont know what youre definition of legitimate is, but he was willing to have the test done but just not 30 days before the fight.the guy is obviously superstitious cuz he actually really believes he lost the first morales fight b/c he had his blood drawn, and yes i do find that a little nutty but to each his own.
Comment
-
You can ask for a 10 million per pound penalty but you can't take a blood test?
Superstition is NOT a legitimate reason, PLEASE TRY AGAIN!
Comment
-
Do you know what the principle of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth ********* to the US Constitution is? Do you know why Sammy Sosa -- who I think was a HUGE juicer -- refused to submit to sportswriter Rick Reilly's offer to take a drug test to prove he was clean?
Here's the summary: If Fighter X doesn't have to do something, I shouldn't have to do it, either. It's not enough for Mayweather to say he'll take the blood test, it's about other fighters in the sport not having to take similar blood tests as what is being asked of Pacquiao. It simply isn't fair until and unless ALL fighters are REQUIRED to do the same thing.
If that were the rule on the books, then I would say "Damn right, Pacquiao had better take the blood test." But it's not, so singling him out for this made-up stipulation isn't fair and won't pass the smell test. It's selective persecution and it reeks of fear and cowardice by Team Mayweather.
I think that Team Mayweather has finally found a way to pull out of this fight and try to blame it on Manny Pacquiao. I'm extremely upset about this development, but if this is how it goes down, it will be worse than Floyd's obvious ducking of Margarito.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KLawN View PostDo you know what the principle of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth ********* to the US Constitution is? Do you know why Sammy Sosa -- who I think was a HUGE juicer -- refused to submit to sportswriter Rick Reilly's offer to take a drug test to prove he was clean?
Here's the summary: If Fighter X doesn't have to do something, I shouldn't have to do it, either. It's not enough for Mayweather to say he'll take the blood test, it's about other fighters in the sport not having to take similar blood tests as what is being asked of Pacquiao. It simply isn't fair until and unless ALL fighters are REQUIRED to do the same thing.
If that were the rule on the books, then I would say "Damn right, Pacquiao had better take the blood test." But it's not, so singling him out for this made-up stipulation isn't fair and won't pass the smell test. It's selective persecution and it reeks of fear and cowardice by Team Mayweather.
I think that Team Mayweather has finally found a way to pull out of this fight and try to blame it on Manny Pacquiao. I'm extremely upset about this development, but if this is how it goes down, it will be worse than Floyd's obvious ducking of Margarito.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheGreatShark View Post...legitimate is the keyword here *******s. If he has nothing to hide, there should be no problem with random drug testing. Period.
next.
Comment
Comment