Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cotto not allowed to rehidrate...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21


    That is a Cotto at 160 pounds. There is no ****ing way Cotto was over 153 vs Pacquiao. No ****ing way.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by PR13 View Post
      Think about it Sherlock, Cotto's most important fight & he didnt come in with the size advantage like all his past fights, and we all know Roach loves to get the upper hand for Pac fights. Im not on a Pac open your eyes, I believe this because of the solid source that I know from the inside.

      Probably because he believed he can match Pac speed for speed. He thinks he has an advantage on power by default.

      Comment


        #23
        Mosley couldn't rehydrate past 149 when he fought Cotto, that's why he lost. I heard it from a VERY reliable source, a guy that knows a guy that knows a guy that could have gone to the fight live but instead gave the tickets to a guy that knows a guy.

        Comment


          #24
          Its useless, you ******s are blinded by PAC IS GOD wagon.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Hard Knocks View Post


            That is a Cotto at 160 pounds. There is no ****ing way Cotto was over 153 vs Pacquiao. No ****ing way.
            At least theres someone smart enough to see the difference.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by PR13 View Post
              Its useless, you ******s are blinded by PAC IS GOD wagon.
              its useless when you expect people to just take your word for it.....its ovbious you love cotto much but he lost to the #1 p4p fair and square.....excuses wont' change that...

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by aether View Post
                what load of horse ****...
                That is the issue most people on here have. Cotto wasn't weight drained but we also know that 2 lbs didn't have a positive affect. I'm still saying Cotto looked 150. It's obvious in my opinion, that Cotto clearly looked smaller then he did against Shane, Clottey and Margarito.
                Last edited by Doctor_Tenma; 11-24-2009, 07:37 AM.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by PR13 View Post
                  Its useless, you ******s are blinded by PAC IS GOD wagon.
                  Your the moron guy. We ask your for proof regarding your allegations yet you can't give us any and your calling us ****** for not believing what you say?

                  Come back here once you have proof to back up your allegations.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Look in the Pacquiao fight how you see his bones in the body



                    Look how 160 Cotto looks.



                    Big difference inn his body and he is way more leaner in the Pacquiao fight with pretty much no fat so that means he did not rehydrate to 160.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View Post
                      That is the issue most people on here have. Cotto wasn't weight drained but we also know that 2 lbs didn't have a positive affect. I'm still saying Cotto looked 150.
                      bull****.......

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP