Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn Reveals Fiaz-Baker Fight Was Pulled Following 'Irregular Betting Activity'

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Comments Thread For: Hearn Reveals Fiaz-Baker Fight Was Pulled Following 'Irregular Betting Activity'

    Promoter Eddie Hearn said the super featherweight fight between 12-1 (1 KO) Aqib Fiaz and 19-11-2 (1 KO) Kane Baker was called off after the Matchroom boss had been made aware of irregular betting activity.
    [Click Here To Read More]

    #2
    Didn’t pull fights when a guy tested positive though.
    gooderz84 gooderz84 MulaKO MulaKO like this.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post
      Didn’t pull fights when a guy tested positive though.
      You do know test results are AFTER a fight, right?

      Comment


        #4
        Need to look at some of the refs and judges because some of the decisions they make makes you think they've got some $$$ on the fights lool
        pnut901 pnut901 likes this.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by IAmABoxingGuru View Post

          You do know test results are AFTER a fight, right?
          He's referencing Benn

          He knew Benn at tested negative a month earlier. He only cancelled the fight two days before the fight because the failed tests got leaked to the media on fight week. Eddie was trying to put the fight on still after knowing for a month about a failed test.

          He only cancelled the fight because the BBBoC refused to licence and the public pressure.
          The Translator Clegg likes this.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post
            Didn’t pull fights when a guy tested positive though.
            Hearn has finally become aware of my crazy bets

            Comment


              #7
              Wonder what the betting activity was. The easiest way to throw a fight would be a KO in 1, lot less chance of undesirable outcomes happening.
              Maybe they were betting big on something like that.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by deathofaclown View Post

                He's referencing Benn

                He knew Benn at tested negative a month earlier. He only cancelled the fight two days before the fight because the failed tests got leaked to the media on fight week. Eddie was trying to put the fight on still after knowing for a month about a failed test.

                He only cancelled the fight because the BBBoC refused to licence and the public pressure.
                you are correct Sir............and the only reason Hearn is saying anything now about betting is bc he can get his name out there again. And a few other benifits along the way, not there is anything wrong with that......

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by 57Blues View Post

                  you are correct Sir............and the only reason Hearn is saying anything now about betting is bc he can get his name out there again. And a few other benifits along the way, not there is anything wrong with that......
                  Eddie is mentioning the betting because a fight was pulled on one of his cards. Why would he be quiet about it? Strange you think he only did so to get his name out there when i think everyone knows who he is at this point. He's not an up and comer or anything.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by IAmABoxingGuru View Post

                    You do know test results are AFTER a fight, right?
                    Oscar Rivas ; did you know ???
                    Lmfao

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP