NSB PICK EM 2022 #30 - #32 SATURDAY 14th MAY

[Mammoth]

Mammoth, Yoka, Decision, Clear
Mammoth, Ennis, KO, Mid x3
Mammoth, Castaņo, Decision, Close x5

[YoungManRumble]

YMR

Yoka, Decision, Clear
Ennis, KO, Late
Castano, Decision, Close x5

[Damn Wicked]

Damn Wicked

Yoka, KO, Late
Ennis, KO, mid
Castano, Decision, Close

[Citizen Koba]

FMW dominant Canelo and got a draw on one card. I've seen several fights in blowouts but a hometown judge gives a fighter card. Looks better on a fighters record vs. a wide UD. Don't overthink.

I think what my man Tatabanya is trying to say is that your Pick of 'SD dominant' is not expressed in a way that conforms with the Pick Em format and would only grant you a maximum of 30 points instead of the 40 that would be possible if you were to specify CLOSE or CLEAR. I'd assume that by saying you think it'd be an SD that you're talking about a CLOSE decison but unless you actually say so we can't give you the extra points if that's how it plays out.

FWIW if you do fancy Bakole in this one (and it'll be hard to beat the judges in Paris I think) it might be worth adding an optional x5 multiplier on top which would give you some serious points on your Pick Em debut.

Best of luck, man, whichever way you decide to jump.

EDIT: Ah. Didn't see siablo14 s response to you... typically we use WIDE rather than 'dominant' for DECISION picks which is perhaps where the confusion has crept in. Choosing WIDE / DOMINANT would suggest you believe that the total difference on all 3 judges cards combined would be in excess of 15 points. This isn't technically incompatible with a Split Decison but I've never seen scores that would produce such a result in 5 years doing this... be something like Bakole 100 - 90, 98 - 92, 95 - 95.

If you genuinely believe Martin will win wide on the cards I'd suggest phrasing it thusly rather than including the specificity of a Split Decison : BAKOLE DEC WIDE

[Citizen Koba]

KOBA:

Yoka DEC CLEAR
Ennis KO MID x3
Charlo DEC CLOSE

[Tatabanya]

I think what my man Tatabanya is trying to say is that your Pick of 'SD dominant' is not expressed in a way that conforms with the Pick Em format and would only grant you a maximum of 30 points instead of the 40 that would be possible if you were to specify CLOSE or CLEAR. I'd assume that by saying you think it'd be an SD that you're talking about a CLOSE decison but unless you actually say so we can't give you the extra points if that's how it plays out.

FWIW if you do fancy Bakole in this one (and it'll be hard to beat the judges in Paris I think) it might be worth adding an optional x5 multiplier on top which would give you some serious points on your Pick Em debut.

Best of luck, man, whichever way you decide to jump.

EDIT: Ah. Didn't see siablo14 s response to you... typically we use WIDE rather than 'dominant' for DECISION picks which is perhaps where the confusion has crept in. Choosing WIDE / DOMINANT would suggest you believe that the total difference on all 3 judges cards combined would be in excess of 15 points. This isn't technically incompatible with a Split Decison but I've never seen scores that would produce such a result in 5 years doing this... be something like Bakole 100 - 90, 98 - 92, 95 - 95.

If you genuinely believe Martin will win wide on the cards I'd suggest phrasing it thusly rather including the specificity of a Split Decison : BAKOLE DEC WIDE

If Bakole gets knocked out, both of us will have uselessly wasted a lot of energies..

[SteveM]

I try to time stamp the start when the bell rings, typically. That’s what I’ll be doing tomorrow night on 2 of the 2 fights. Good question to make sure everyone is abreast

thanks NC ......

[Idunnoshet]

Idunnoshet
Yoka / Dec / Wide
Ennis / KO / Mid x3
Charlo / Dec / Close

[koolkc107]

Koolkc107, Yoka, KO, MID
Koolkc107, Ennis KO, MID x3
Koolkc107, Charlo, KO, LATE x2

[MulaKO]

Yoka KO Mid X2