Comments Thread For: Shannon Courtenay Misses Weight, Loses WBA Title At Scale; Fight With Jamie Mitchell To Proceed

[PBR Streetgang]

I don't post much due to the extreme creepiness on these threads because it's a cesspit of insanity where weirdo's live in a fantasy world and act like people have killed their family because their fighters keep on getting exposed for lying all the time and ducking fights.

You realize you are talking about yourself? Haha! You make me laugh you little joke of man.

[PBR Streetgang]

Seems you can't let something go yourself.

Again you are are talking of yourself. Please respond more so I, and others here on NSB, can continue to laugh at you.

[Sid-Knee]

How many more paragraphs did you write here now? Nevermind I don't bother to read your rubbish. I guess I really struck a nerve with you little weirdo. Every one is laughing at you. Time to sulk with those pictures of Hearn and Courtenay you hold so tight in these dark hours. I look forward to laughing and not reading at the next dozen paragraphs you write.

I wanted to be precise considering your delusion. But it still didn't work. Don't worry, i expected it.

Projections again. The only one who has had their nerves struck is clearly you. A simple question after trying to run a narrative made you lose it.

No one is laughing. The two idiots had their own agendas. Why else did he mention AJ and Usyk when the topic is Hearn? Because he's a Fury fanatic. The other gets buried by me like you're doing now. On a piece that was two weeks old. Think about it. If you can.

Yes or no- Did Eddie or Ganglof make any comment what so ever on never appearing on a Matchroom card again? I'm just going to keep you pushed into a corner now due to how badly you've taken all this. Answer to your comments, or walk away like you weirdo's do. Your choice.

[PBR Streetgang]

I wanted to be precise considering your delusion. But it still didn't work. Don't worry, i expected it.

Projections again. The only one who has had their nerves struck is clearly you. A simple question after trying to run a narrative made you lose it.

No one is laughing. The two idiots had their own agendas. Why else did he mention AJ and Usyk when the topic is Hearn? Because he's a Fury fanatic. The other gets buried by me like you're doing now. On a piece that was two weeks old. Think about it. If you can.

Yes or no- Did Eddie or Ganglof make any comment what so ever on never appearing on a Matchroom card again? I'm just going to keep you pushed into a corner now due to how badly you've taken all this. Answer to your comments, or walk away like you weirdo's do. Your choice.

What a pleasant surprise to see another rambling post from my favorite incel nationalist. Yes or No? Are you some type of barrister? Where did I make a claim that there was a comment? You push people into a corner, not through any brilliant debate but through cognitive disconnect with reality and rambling diatribes making false claims. NSB posters don't walk away from your debates because they concede, they walk away because you're a weird alt fanboy that doesn't engage in normal discourse. It's creepy and pathetic.

Comprehension isn't a strong suit of yours but let me help explain things through that xenophobic little head of yours. I said:

The French fighter deserved the win against Ebanie Bridges in her last fight and would give Courtenay a proper test. Of course, maybe that's the reason Matchroom wouldn't want Gangloff back in the ring.

My comment states that Gangloff is a proper test. Hearn does not want Courtenay to have a proper test and would rather feed her soft opposition (which she lost to anyway). My inference that Matchroom would not want any proper test (i.e. Gangloff or any other) in the ring with Courtenay clearly went over your head as you wanted to interpret everything in a literal sense yet you go on to say....

Bridges broke her hand, but she did edge it.

The French girl has just fought. Do you think she would come back a week later to confirm whether Eddie wants her back or not? Haha.

Gangloff fought on September 4, Courtenay's fight was month and five days later. Yet you claim it's a week apart. Now you don't want me to interpret this in a literal sense? GTFOH weirdo. Your inconsistent application of literal interpretation makes you a hypocrite and a boor. I look forward to your next weekly manifesto when you get more data on your phone plan.

[Sid-Knee]

What a pleasant surprise to see another rambling post from my favorite incel nationalist. Yes or No? Are you some type of barrister? Where did I make a claim that there was a comment? You push people into a corner, not through any brilliant debate but through cognitive disconnect with reality and rambling diatribes making false claims. NSB posters don't walk away from your debates because they concede, they walk away because you're a weird alt fanboy that doesn't engage in normal discourse. It's creepy and pathetic.

Comprehension isn't a strong suit of yours but let me help explain things through that xenophobic little head of yours. I said:


My comment states that Gangloff is a proper test. Hearn does not want Courtenay to have a proper test and would rather feed her soft opposition (which she lost to anyway). My inference that Matchroom would not want any proper test (i.e. Gangloff or any other) in the ring with Courtenay clearly went over your head as you wanted to interpret everything in a literal sense yet you go on to say....




Gangloff fought on September 4, Courtenay's fight was month and five days later. Yet you claim it's a week apart. Now you don't want me to interpret this in a literal sense? GTFOH weirdo. Your inconsistent application of literal interpretation makes you a hypocrite and a boor. I look forward to your next weekly manifesto when you get more data on your phone plan.

More delusion and projection. All this over a simple question. But hey, deranged people will live in a fantasy world but go through the most disturbing behaviours when asked to justify a comment. It's the reason i do so with all the extremists from your end. I know it's not true and know they can't back it up. But guess what? They keep on making these comments don't you? You people literally make my skin crawl in how warped you actually are. Look up your behaviours i've listed and see why the psychiatric world considers them to be the most dangerous. The vast majority of you Americans have these behaviours.

You did mean it literally. Here is a quote that clearly showed you did.

"She's fought twice in a month before. Bridges fought Bec Connolly the month prior to her fight. It's not an uncommon event to fight a month later"

You were trying to justify your ****** comment. You could have cleared it up quite easily otherwise. But then i told you Courtney was already sighed on to fight Mitchell months earlier but your ego wouldn't allow you to back down, so it went all the way to insanity. Eddie actually wants tests for his fighters. He doesn't protect them like all the others do. But i can assure you, Ganglof isn't a test. But for some reason, you wanted to create that narrative.

You don't even know Ganglof either. She's not one of the top fighters. She's a nobody. If Eddie thought she was something, he would not have put Ebanie in the ring with her in the first place. You know, the girl that Shannon beat clearly? Hell, Ebanie beat Ganglof even with a damaged hand. But your delusion had you thinking Eddie saw her as some destructive force he couldn't let Shannon near. He'd put Shannon in with her at any time. Shannon would beat her. At no point did Eddie make any hint of not wanting her back on one of his shows. Nor did Ganglof make any such comment. You made it up in your head and ran with this fantasy. But got your f3cked up panties in a twist when i showed what an imbecile you are and you tried to play the smart one and tried to back track. Then the typical behaviours came out. So thanks for showing your hand. I actually thought you were one of the few who could rationalise before this thread. Not any more though.

You accused me on running a narrative on this thread too. You also said i was doing so in the past. But point out what comment of mine on this very thread had you come up with this delusion? And make sure it's a comment of mine before you made your comment. Don't want to get pushed back into that corner now do you.