Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AJ is the biggest hype job of this generation and it isn't close

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by denium View Post

    Before he got stopped by Ruiz you were calling him a potential GOAT

    You calmed down for a bit after that, but then you got mega excited again after he stopped that old bum Pulev.
    No i wasn't. You always lie and can't back it up. You're the one making ridiculous claims of Fury being a ATG.
    Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 09-27-2021, 04:02 AM.

    Comment


      #42
      OP had the effing nerve to call AJ protected, how? if he was protected he wouldnt be going in against 6-6ft 3 elite boxers (both usyk and ruiz have a solid amateur backround) with quck reflexes, that's the style he lost the olympic final to. AJ clearly wasnt protected and wanted all the smoke, he was clearly going for the Fury fight.. Wilder has been a big joke. He cherry picked a 50% Fury and only picked Fury again when he saw the otto wallin performance. Likewise, even the guy he beat, Ortiz, had no real resume but they decided to brand him the 'boogeyman' and he has since fought eff all but Wilder all over again.


      i'm fair minded about them all and don't overhype some of them. I can see their strengths and weaknesses. For example dubois lost to joyce and i see the utter crap comments when I defend him and say he would beat up Wilder.
      'oh but he da bum,. he da ovahype job'
      no mate, his qualities were neutralised by joe joyce with a granite chin and superior boxing skills, reach etc. Dubois landed enough times that if he put it on Wilder in the same manner, he would finish Wilder.



      About Fury, kind of like Kell Brook when he beat Porter, Fury had the benefit of being a relatively unknown quantity at the highest level. He beat Wlad...outboxed him and trust me, I SUPPORTED FURY all the way, so not hating here. He didnt take the rematch and had the nandrolone controversy where he deliberately said hateful things to paint himself as a persecuted character and thus have a cover story for the drug ban.
      He has come in by stealth, beating an UNPROVEN AND OVERHYPED wilder.

      Fury does not have the best chin, we all know that. Wilder has many flaws because he can't box and is weirdly built. Perhaps Fury would outbox AJ, but would he consistently fight the likes of Aj, Joyce, Dubois, Hrgovic, Usyk, Jalolov etc...a bad night against that calibre would land him a loss. He doesnt fight back to back against tough opponents. He takes a break, low entropy fights, fake old testament convos with God and depression stories etc. eff that, im not going to overhype fury just cuz aj lost. They all are flawed.

      The way i see it, there's so so much talent in the division but each one has it's flaws and can come up short.


      Lastly, hype comes with performances. AJ was hyped when he was unbeaten and he deserved that 'hype' given all the guys he had beaten eg Wlad, Whyte, parker, povetkin. Since the Ruiz loss, people have used that against him. He was told he couldnt beat ruiz..and he did. He's now suffered another loss, he will receive all the criticism that comes with it. So where's the hype?

      beyond pathetic some of what i read on here. low class cellar chavs some of you lot.






      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post

        No i wasn't. You always lie and can't back it up.
        You're well known as being one of the biggest AJ nuthuggers on here, it's one of the reasons why you were voted as the worst poster of the decade.

        Don't attempt to deny it.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by denium View Post

          You're well known as being one of the biggest AJ nuthuggers on here, it's one of the reasons why you were voted as the worst poster of the decade.

          Don't attempt to deny it.
          I never once called him an ATG. I've constantly said this era of HW's is ****. I can provide posts to prove it if you want. I bet you can't to back up your words.

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post

            He has beaten more top 10 HW's than Fury and Wilder combined.
            And the rankings mean absolutely **** all these days.

            You AJ fanboys are just morons. Even after that mediocre performance, you're still defending this ****ing guy. You're clueless about boxing. Absolute know nothing. Do yourself a favor and start some weekly boxing classes and actually learn about the sport. Every dude I train with saw this coming a mile away. I had to listen to your absolute garbage takes for months, Joshua's entire opposition is junk. Parker has amounted to nothing. Povetkin was old and popped before fighting Wilder years ago. Takam is a gatekeeper starched in easier fashion by a both a past his prime chisora and Joyce now. Pulev isn't even really worthy of discussion. Ruiz is undisciplined and looked tentative against guys like ****ing Arreola. Wlad is his one notable win but it was nearly five goddamn years ago.

            Saturday's performance was ****ing mediocre. Analysing it again, no one could ever claim the guy to be someone who even belongs in the top 3 of the division. He had absolutely zero answers for Usyk and didn't even seem to recognise his own success through bodywork and commitment to the jab. It was the performance of someone who has been protected their entire career. In the championship rounds he didn't even seem like he wanted to be there. Getting pushed back and pummeled by the smaller man. That's your example of a deserving unified champion. Some of the mistakes were basic **** your run of the mill coach would tell you not to do. His footwork was all over the place and he was telegraphic his right. Stumbling after every remotely decent power shot thrown by Usyk.

            You spout of "rankings" because you don't know **** about this sport. Just like your fanboyism of Joshua, your entire understanding is based upon what you've been fed by Eddie Hearn. ****ing laughable. Lemme guess, you legit think Dillian ****ing Whyte is the 4th best heavyweight in the world too???

            You're just not well versed in this sport my guy.
            Boxing-1013 Boxing-1013 likes this.

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by KingGilgamesh View Post

              And the rankings mean absolutely **** all these days.

              You AJ fanboys are just morons. Even after that mediocre performance, you're still defending this ****ing guy. You're clueless about boxing. Absolute know nothing. Do yourself a favor and start some weekly boxing classes and actually learn about the sport. Every dude I train with saw this coming a mile away. I had to listen to your absolute garbage takes for months, Joshua's entire opposition is junk. Parker has amounted to nothing. Povetkin was old and popped before fighting Wilder years ago. Takam is a gatekeeper starched in easier fashion by a both a past his prime chisora and Joyce now. Pulev isn't even really worthy of discussion. Ruiz is undisciplined and looked tentative against guys like ****ing Arreola. Wlad is his one notable win but it was nearly five goddamn years ago.

              Saturday's performance was ****ing mediocre. Analysing it again, no one could ever claim the guy to be someone who even belongs in the top 3 of the division. He had absolutely zero answers for Usyk and didn't even seem to recognise his own success through bodywork and commitment to the jab. It was the performance of someone who has been protected their entire career. In the championship rounds he didn't even seem like he wanted to be there. Getting pushed back and pummeled by the smaller man. That's your example of a deserving unified champion. Some of the mistakes were basic **** your run of the mill coach would tell you not to do. His footwork was all over the place and he was telegraphic his right. Stumbling after every remotely decent power shot thrown by Usyk.

              You spout of "rankings" because you don't know **** about this sport. Just like your fanboyism of Joshua, your entire understanding is based upon what you've been fed by Eddie Hearn. ****ing laughable. Lemme guess, you legit think Dillian ****ing Whyte is the 4th best heavyweight in the world too???

              You're just not well versed in this sport my guy.
              Rankings by TBRB mean nothing? OK clown move along. Boxing fans know they're th best rankings.

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post

                I never once called him an ATG. I've constantly said this era of HW's is ****. I can provide posts to prove it if you want. I bet you can't to back up your words.
                I already owned you last week when you asked for proof, but yeah I'll dig out some of your old posts later when I'm not at work. That's if you haven't been back to edit them like you usually do.

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by denium View Post

                  I already owned you last week when you asked for proof, but yeah I'll dig out some of your old posts later when I'm not at work. That's if you haven't been back to edit them like you usually do.
                  Lies again. Why can't you stop lying? You never acknowedge how i predicted Fury would pull out of the Joshua fight either. I know the guy better than you.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by Inspired View Post
                    OP had the effing nerve to call AJ protected, how? if he was protected he wouldnt be going in against 6-6ft 3 elite boxers (both usyk and ruiz have a solid amateur backround) with quck reflexes, that's the style he lost the olympic final to. AJ clearly wasnt protected and wanted all the smoke, he was clearly going for the Fury fight.. Wilder has been a big joke. He cherry picked a 50% Fury and only picked Fury again when he saw the otto wallin performance. Likewise, even the guy he beat, Ortiz, had no real resume but they decided to brand him the 'boogeyman' and he has since fought eff all but Wilder all over again.


                    i'm fair minded about them all and don't overhype some of them. I can see their strengths and weaknesses. For example dubois lost to joyce and i see the utter crap comments when I defend him and say he would beat up Wilder.
                    'oh but he da bum,. he da ovahype job'
                    no mate, his qualities were neutralised by joe joyce with a granite chin and superior boxing skills, reach etc. Dubois landed enough times that if he put it on Wilder in the same manner, he would finish Wilder.



                    About Fury, kind of like Kell Brook when he beat Porter, Fury had the benefit of being a relatively unknown quantity at the highest level. He beat Wlad...outboxed him and trust me, I SUPPORTED FURY all the way, so not hating here. He didnt take the rematch and had the nandrolone controversy where he deliberately said hateful things to paint himself as a persecuted character and thus have a cover story for the drug ban.
                    He has come in by stealth, beating an UNPROVEN AND OVERHYPED wilder.

                    Fury does not have the best chin, we all know that. Wilder has many flaws because he can't box and is weirdly built. Perhaps Fury would outbox AJ, but would he consistently fight the likes of Aj, Joyce, Dubois, Hrgovic, Usyk, Jalolov etc...a bad night against that calibre would land him a loss. He doesnt fight back to back against tough opponents. He takes a break, low entropy fights, fake old testament convos with God and depression stories etc. eff that, im not going to overhype fury just cuz aj lost. They all are flawed.

                    The way i see it, there's so so much talent in the division but each one has it's flaws and can come up short.


                    Lastly, hype comes with performances. AJ was hyped when he was unbeaten and he deserved that 'hype' given all the guys he had beaten eg Wlad, Whyte, parker, povetkin. Since the Ruiz loss, people have used that against him. He was told he couldnt beat ruiz..and he did. He's now suffered another loss, he will receive all the criticism that comes with it. So where's the hype?

                    beyond pathetic some of what i read on here. low class cellar chavs some of you lot.





                    Again, with these absolute ****ing idiots, notice how they cannot analyse **** without the bull**** hype spiel thats been fed to them by Hearn...

                    aJ tOp 1o rEsuMe!!!11!!

                    wIldEr is UnProVeN!!11!

                    wLaD, wHyTE, pOvEtKiN, PaRKer!!!11!!


                    Nothing these guys say is based on any kind of analysis of the actual ****ing ring work. People who feel Joshua is overhyped have always believed so based on his actual work in the ring. I bet even ****ing you can't really give me anything that makes his fighting exceptional. Absolutely nothing about Joshua stands out tehcnique/ability wise. Nothing.
                    Boxing-1013 Boxing-1013 likes this.

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post

                      Lies again. Why can't you stop lying? You never acknowedge how i predicted Fury would pull out of the Joshua fight either. I know the guy better than you.
                      Why would i lie? People know exactly what you're about, hence you being the most despised poster on here.

                      I'll dig out your old posts, you can't edit all of them.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP