Manny Pacquiao is not top 10-30 all time...

[Google_It_Bitch]

The man is a great fighter and has the opportunity to be the greatest of his decade but that doesn't place him that high on the all time list. For samples I looked at ESPN's list.

1. Sugar Ray Robinson
2. Muhammad Ali
3. Henry Armstrong
4. Joe Louis
5. Willie Pep
6. Roberto Duran
7. Benny Leonard
8. Jack Johnson
9. Jack Dempsey
10. Sam Langford
11. Joe Gans
12. Sugar Ray Leonard
13. Harry Greb
14. Rocky Marciano
15. Jimmy Wilde
16. Gene Tunney
17. Mickey Walker
19. Stanley Ketchel
20. George Foreman
21. Tony Canzoneri
22. Barney Ross
23. Jimmy McLarnin
24. Julio Cesar Chavez
25. Marcel Cerdan
26. Joe Frazier
27. Ezzard Charles
18. Archie Moore
28. Jake LaMotta
29. Sandy Saddler
30. Terry McGovern

I know some don't like this list but who on here that is notable to you outside of maybe Chavez(and he even has a billion wins) would you put Pacquiao ahead of?

And please, this thread has nothing to do with Mayweather cuz he aint in the top 30 either.

Considering that Manny came from the Jr Fly Middle Weight Division and has beat two great fighters in ODLH at 147 made him quit like a biatch and then went down and destroyed Hatton @ 140 in 2 rounds and made it look like a walk in the park. Manny built up more of sweat in the locker room than he did in the actual fight.

Manny is being compared to Henry Armstrong and Manny is not done yet.
So far, Manny is retiring more fighters than social security and Floyd might be on that list of retiree's. If Pacman beats Floyd, where do you put Manny on that list that Floyd will not make it on.?

Let's wait until The Human Tsunami is done before we go on but if you want to place pac in that 30 list, I would have no problem seeing him go in the top 15 greatest of all time.
Not last time, not the time before, not hammer time but of all time.

[-EX-]

Pernell's resume isn't all that compared to those guys. Hearns lost plenty of his big fights.

You guys just haven't heard of Sandy Saddler and a few others...that's why your saying Pac is in the top 30...

[boxasmash]

pacquiao is top 20, top 15 maybe.

best fighter of the era without a doubt, the others are a long way back.

[m00ks]

Its either Bernard, Mayweather, or Pacquiao.

Everyone has their own opinion...Bernard beat a lotta guys but he usually put them at disadvantages...

Pacquiao beat a drained Morales, Barrera, JMM, and Hatton. And a drained DLH...

Mayweather beat Castillo, Corrales, Hatton, past prime DLH...

Mayweather beat a past prime DLH, a chinny Corrales, a mediocre Castillo and a Hatton out of his weight class...

See how your logic can easily be employed?

[tito yuca]

Bull **** List Tommy Hearns, Pernell Whitaker and Manny Pacquiao are top 30 Period.

Hearns 17, Pacquiao 23, Whitaker 27!!!!!!!!!!!!!

loco por favor

explain to me why pacquiao is above whitaker

[-EX-]

Considering that Manny came from the Jr Fly Middle Weight Division and has beat two great fighters in ODLH at 147 made him quit like a biatch and then went down and destroyed Hatton @ 140 in 2 rounds and made it look like a walk in the park. Manny built up more of sweat in the locker room than he did in the actual fight.

Manny is being compared to Henry Armstrong and Manny is not done yet.
So far, Manny is retiring more fighters than social security and Floyd might be on that list of retiree's. If Pacman beats Floyd, where do you put Manny on that list that Floyd will not make it on.?

Let's wait until The Human Tsunami is done before we go one but if you want to place in that 30 list, I would have no problem seeing him go in the top 15 greatest of all time.
Not last time, not the time before, not hammer time but of all time.

If Manny beats Floyd he's he fighter of the decade and possibly may pass Bernard, and RJJ. He could make it in the mid 30's or so...

[Main Event]

Your list is ****. Multiple heavyweights and no sign of Larry Holmes!

That is ESPN's list buddy

[NAPO]

loco por favor

explain to me why pacquiao is above whitaker

are you kidding?

PAC resume is RARE in this era.

[-EX-]

Mayweather beat a past prime DLH, a chinny Corrales, a mediocre Castillo and a Hatton out of his weight class...

See how your logic can easily be employed?

My logic was applied to all 3 fighters. Bernard beat a lotta those guys when he put them at disadvantages. Pavlik and Winky at 170. A possibly drained Tarver. Sayin some1 is chinny and mediocre isn't the same thing...

[KILLA RIGHT]

If Manny beats Floyd he's he fighter of the decade and possibly may pass Bernard, and RJJ. He could make it in the mid 30's or so...

Agreed if he beats floyd he is the best of his era. But i think the floyd era was before this era. But he would replace floyd as the best of his era. But not right now,plus we gotta wait till his career is over, because we might over hype him or not give him his due till we find out what he did