Manny Pacquiao is not top 10-30 all time...

[-EX-]

Man you don't know what you're talking about. HOFers are different from ATG's.
I think you're just flooding. Typical Floyd fanboys.

Ken Norton has better victories than plenty of the guys on Pac's resume...

[IMDAZED]

Foreman, Evander,Frazier...

What about them?

[Alibata]

For some, it's really hard to understand..

I wonder why nobody in history has never been able to capture 4 LINEAL, not alphabet, LINEAL titles. Because it aint that easy to do.

[IMDAZED]

Ken Norton has better victories than plenty of the guys on Pac's resume...

So are we arguing now that Ken Norton has a better resume than Manny Pacquiao? Just want to clarify.

[-EX-]

I wonder why nobody in history has never been able to capture 4 LINEAL, not alphabet, LINEAL titles. Because it aint that easy to do.

Most don't turn pro at 17 or 18 years old...and face tougher competition. Hatton won't be remembered as a great fighter. A good one...

[-EX-]

What about them?

So u think Pac would have a better resume than all 3 with a win over Floyd?

[IMDAZED]

Most don't turn pro at 17 or 18 years old...and face tougher competition. Hatton won't be remembered as a great fighter. A good one...

Another notch under Manny's belt.

[-EX-]

So are we arguing now that Ken Norton has a better resume than Manny Pacquiao? Just want to clarify.

Hell no, but he has better wins than a lotta guys that Pac beat...

[m00ks]

World titles don't mean anything if the opponent isn't any good. The main criteria(for me at least) is opponents. In that area he doesn't surpass these other guys...

But LINEAL championships do. Which exactly what he won. We're not simply looking at quality of opponents here, it's quality of victories. I dont know how you can scoff at Pac's and not put it up there.

[IMDAZED]

So u think Pac would have a better resume than all 3 with a win over Floyd?

You brought them up! Explain why he wouldn't.