Penalosa vs. Ponce De Leon... Nuthuggery at its finest... Most scribes thought the fight was closer and even had Penalosa winning... HBO commentary made it seem so one sided. Funny thing is that they could not show any highlights of Ponce cuz he was getting hit with the bigger shots and he wasn't really getting past Penalosa guard...Even running in the end.
I thought De Leon's win over Escobedo was questionable too. I watched the Skysports version though, i dont know how HBO saw that fight for De Leon.
Well I agree that they are not perfect and sometimes doing mistakes, but when you are watching the same fight comentating by HBO (espacialy Lamply) the fight is much more entertining than other comentators. Lamply is making fights much more dramatic than they usually are....
Foreman was getting on my nerves a bit during the Hopkins-Tito fight. I think even Merchant was annoyed by his blatant Tito nuthuggery... until that last round.
latest one I can think of is "Cotto vs Margarito" even when Margarito was beating up Cotto Lampley kept giving credit to Cotto and taking from Margarito wish was really annoying and ******.
Foreman was getting on my nerves a bit during the Hopkins-Tito fight. I think even Merchant was annoyed by his blatant Tito nuthuggery... until that last round.
Yea, Foreman annoys me every time I watch that fight...
I think George Foreman was the most biased. He always backed the champion but he had know clue what he was talking about. It sounded as though he had money on some fights.
On more than one occasion I've thought to myself "God, George is just riding the other dude bad", most notably he was favoring Ruiz against Jones and Trinidad against Hopkins. It always seemed to me like George was going for the puncher/bigger fighter.
Foreman was getting on my nerves a bit during the Hopkins-Tito fight. I think even Merchant was annoyed by his blatant Tito nuthuggery... until that last round.
He sure was.
He was pretty pissed at Lampley too during the Whitaker-Oscar bout.
Comment