Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Real Reason Why PAC Wants More Than 50%

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Real Reason Why PAC Wants More Than 50%

    If you check my figures below, Mayweather clearly received more than Hatton. This was the deal on the purse split between Mayweather and Hatton.

    1. Mayweather received $11 million in guaranteed money while Hatton received $6 million.

    2. Hatton receives all the 1.25 million sale in U.K. pay per view at 20 euros a pop or $30 U.S.
    So that's about $37.5 million U.S. dollars.

    3. Mayweather receives all the U.S. pay per view revenue. According to Mark Taffet, U.S. ppv generated $47 million. ... id=3158134

    Let's calculate, I don't know what the cable company split, promoter split, etc....on ppv sales.... so let's just add the total ppv revenues with the guaranteed money for both fighters.

    Mayweather: 11 million + 47 million = $58 million

    Hatton: 6 million + 37.5 million = $43.5 million

    Clearly, Mayweather made more than Hatton. So how is 50/50 fair with this current pound 4 pound if it wasn't fair during the Mayweather fight.

    Here's the link for the British ppv figures and the guaranteed money:

    #2
    makes sense

    but that was the fight that truly proved how big a draw Hatton was

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
      If you check my figures below, Mayweather clearly received more than Hatton. This was the deal on the purse split between Mayweather and Hatton.

      1. Mayweather received $11 million in guaranteed money while Hatton received $6 million.

      2. Hatton receives all the 1.25 million sale in U.K. pay per view at 20 euros a pop or $30 U.S.

      So that's about $37.5 million U.S. dollars.

      3. Mayweather receives all the U.S. pay per view revenue. According to Mark Taffet, U.S. ppv generated $47 million. ... id=3158134

      Let's calculate, I don't know what the cable company split, promoter split, etc....on ppv sales.... so let's just add the total ppv revenues with the guaranteed money for both fighters.

      Mayweather: 11 million + 47 million = $58 million

      Hatton: 6 million + 37.5 million = $43.5 million

      Clearly, Mayweather made more than Hatton. So how is 50/50 fair with this current pound 4 pound if it wasn't fair during the Mayweather fight.

      Here's the link for the British ppv figures and the guaranteed money:
      That's wrong. British people use the Pound not the Euro and at the time of the fight British Sterling was worth twice that of the dollar.

      Comment


        #4
        If Hatton recieved 'all' of the PPV in the UK, what's in it for Sky Box Office then? Hatton takes a cut of the PPV sales (50/50 or something similar). To give him the entire PPV purse on top of his boxing purse would be a financial disaster for all those involved in the promotion game.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by CasperUK View Post
          If Hatton recieved 'all' of the PPV in the UK, what's in it for Sky Box Office then? Hatton takes a cut of the PPV sales (50/50 or something similar). To give him the entire PPV purse on top of his boxing purse would be a financial disaster for all those involved in the promotion game.
          what he said

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by S.G. View Post
            makes sense

            but that was the fight that truly proved how big a draw Hatton was
            NO.... hatton is a draw, but it was because he was fighting the best fighter in the world.... that made the fight interesting... hattons a draw but it was who he was fighting and what was on the line that made it that big

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by reedickyaluss View Post
              NO.... hatton is a draw, but it was because he was fighting the best fighter in the world.... that made the fight interesting... hattons a draw but it was who he was fighting and what was on the line that made it that big
              yes, and it was the fact that it was him, the Hatton the British public all know and love, fighting the best fighter in the world

              if you're saying the situation itself was the biggest draw in that fight i kind of agree, but in the UK the fact that it was Hatton involved in that situation made it that much bigger

              Hatton provided the basis and gave it the oomph, while the circumstances lent themselves to promoting it as a huge event

              Comment


                #8
                I tend to believe he's still pissed over DLH gettin the bigger cut in their fight when he was the smaller guy takin all the risk. He won it big and reasonably so, feels he can call some shots on this one.

                Comment


                  #9
                  50 per cent, at least, is what Hatton should receive. After all, Manny is the challenger.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by gridiron View Post
                    50 per cent, at least, is what Hatton should receive. After all, Manny is the challenger.
                    Oddly enough, I don't see it that way. Sure, he IS the challenger, but Hatton has an obsession about becoming #1 P4P, so in that sense, Hatton is a challenger, too, because Manny is right at the top of the game. Regardless, beating Pac wouldn't actually make him #1 anyway.

                    As Reed said in the other thread, for Pac, this seems to be more about respect than money. I don't think he is a greedy person, as some have suggested. It's not in his nature to be greedy, this is all about respect for his overall status in boxing.



                    | |

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP