Originally posted by Eaner0919
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Golden Boy Prom. vs. Pacquiao: A Hollow War of Words
Collapse
-
great freckin article, i especially like the first/second paragraph how true it is and how much i want to see a third fight but afraid it might not happenLast edited by commandant; 09-19-2008, 11:57 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eaner0919 View Postbig news for you my man
yo soy Filipino
see unlike you and your ilk I don't judge fighters solely by the nationality I am. You on the other ONLY base your judgements on nationality as it pertains to the sport.
and again you just owned yourself yet again. If, as you say, it was a close fight....AGAIN.. why is there such an uproar from the myopic Manny fans whenever someone brings up wanting to see a trilogy from them?
and here is something for you Manny fans to swallow long and hard
why didn't you guys cause an uproar when they announced a third Morales fight? or a Barrera rematch? I mean by then you could see both Morales and Barrera being faded shells of theirselves why did your fandom be fine with these fights yet get so worked up over a third fight between two closesly contested warriors?
now go **** yourself narrow minded douche bag
Morales/Pac 2= PAC
Morales/Pac 3= PAC
Barrera/Pac1= PAC
Barrera/PAc2= PAC
no need for a third fight.
Marquez vs PAc 1= DRAW (PAC)
Marquez vs PAC 2= PAC
No need for a 3rd fight.
Now ,if it was
Marquez vs PAC= Marquez
Marquez vs PAC= Pac
Then a 3rd fight is a must.
NOW
Barrera vs Juarez 1 = Barrera( But Most thought Juarez got ROBBED)
Barrera vs Juarez 2= Barrera
Marquez vs Barrera 1= Marquez( But most thought Barrera 1)
How come I don't see ya'll crying for another fight.
Is it because it's Mexican vs mexican?????
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eaner0919 View Postmost of press row had JMM winning the rematch.
dont ask how I know
stop using boxrec as your shield. You know damn well Manny and JMM are so competitively matched that either fight could have swung either way.
and bottom line
one fighter is asking to settle it
one isn't
Comment
-
i wanted to see a JMM-MAB rematch...Marco gave him a title shot, it was a close fight...they were both GBP fighters at the time...
Comment
-
Originally posted by vErDuGo View PostMorales/Pac 1 = Morales W
Morales/Pac 2= PAC
Morales/Pac 3= PAC
Barrera/Pac1= PAC
Barrera/PAc2= PAC
no need for a third fight.
Marquez vs PAc 1= DRAW (PAC)
Marquez vs PAC 2= PAC
No need for a 3rd fight.
Now ,if it was
Marquez vs PAC= Marquez
Marquez vs PAC= Pac
Then a 3rd fight is a must.
NOW
Barrera vs Juarez 1 = Barrera( But Most thought Juarez got ROBBED)
Barrera vs Juarez 2= Barrera
Marquez vs Barrera 1= Marquez( But most thought Barrera 1)
How come I don't see ya'll crying for another fight.
Is it because it's Mexican vs mexican?????
you mean to tell me a third Morales fight was ok when you and the rest of the Mannyopics knew damn well he was faded and on his last legs?
the same for Barrera? You honestly thought there was intrigue for a rematch? after Barrera went through two tough fights with the rather ordinary Rocky Juarez?
see you only bounce the perspective in your favor when it benefits Manny.
you honestly believe what you wrote in the following?
Barrera vs Juarez 1 = Barrera( But Most thought Juarez got ROBBED)
Marquez vs Barrera 1= Marquez( But most thought Barrera 1)
same with MAB JMM? I have yet to see someone say MAB was clearly robbed other than you and thats to support Manny not fighting JMM a third time
boxrec warrior
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bogler View Postyou're talking out of your ass. press row were split evenly on who won. let me know if you want the list of who scored for who.
I was there covering for this site and around me
the three in front- 2 jmm 1 manny
person on my right manny
person on my left jmm
three behind me 2 jmm 1 manny
5-3 for JMM. Me JMM. so 6-3. Come to think of it maybe ur right because one person could swing it back to virtually even and in my rush to start filming the presser I didnt ask too many other people post fight
my bad
Comment
-
Originally posted by vErDuGo View PostMorales/Pac 1 = Morales W
Morales/Pac 2= PAC
Morales/Pac 3= PAC
Barrera/Pac1= PAC
Barrera/PAc2= PAC
no need for a third fight.
Marquez vs PAc 1= DRAW (PAC)
Marquez vs PAC 2= PAC
No need for a 3rd fight.
Now ,if it was
Marquez vs PAC= Marquez
Marquez vs PAC= Pac
Then a 3rd fight is a must.
NOW
Barrera vs Juarez 1 = Barrera( But Most thought Juarez got ROBBED)
Barrera vs Juarez 2= Barrera
Marquez vs Barrera 1= Marquez( But most thought Barrera 1)
How come I don't see ya'll crying for another fight.
Is it because it's Mexican vs mexican?????
Listen, these pathetic Mexicans dont understand reason so dont bother.... PAC could win 99 CLOSE fights with JMM and these so called Pinoy-haters would cry for the 100th fight.... In other words, lets have PAC keep fighting JMM until either JMM finally gets the nod or he gets his ass knocked out... But, them they'll say why did PAC keep fighting JMM when he was wayyy out of prime...LMAO...
This is so ******... Their point is that everyone wants to see a trilogy because it was action packed suspense thriller very close fight....... DUH, who doesnt want to see a fight like that??? Isnt that what boxing is all about.... But, sadly, JMM was given TWO ****ING chances already and it was close but no cigar... PAC is in the captains chair... If he wants to fight Tom, ****, and harry, and somewhere down the road fight JMM again then thats fine, but if he doesnt then, oh well, JMM had his chances at least...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bogler View Postyou're talking out of your ass. press row were split evenly on who won. let me know if you want the list of who scored for who.
thas crazy.
Comment
Comment