Originally posted by Spiegelo
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hopkins better than Hagler and Monzon?
Collapse
-
Hopkins better than Hagler and Monzon?
36Yes.13.89%5No.83.33%30MSpiegelo's ALT Spiegelo is on crack.2.78%1The poll is expired.
Tags: None
-
-
-
Hopkins is much better than Hagler and Monzon. His uncanny ability to box on HBO during the 1990s and 2000s means that Hagler and Monzon, both archive footage only boxers who we rarely or never see interviewed, simply cannot compete in the clash of styles. Sure, Hagler and Monzon looked good, but where is the exposure, the hype required to be one of boxing's true greats?
Comment
-
abadger , explain your vote!
we all know you're just trying to make bernard look better because joe cal whooped him.
the better bernard looks the better joe cal's win looks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by abadger View PostHopkins is much better than Hagler and Monzon. His uncanny ability to box on HBO during the 1990s and 2000s means that Hagler and Monzon, both archive footage only boxers who we rarely or never see interviewed, simply cannot compete in the clash of styles. Sure, Hagler and Monzon looked good, but where is the exposure, the hype required to be one of boxing's true greats?
Comment
-
No, he's not ****ing with Hagler in his prime. I don't see Hopkins getting knocked out, but I do see him getting broken down..
Comment
-
Comment