Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by ADP02
    [SIZE="3"]DEFLECTO,

    - You kept implying that there cannot be threshold type test criteria.

    - You kept stating that there cannot be threshold type test criteria.


    OH IS THAT WHAT I WAS IMPLYING? REALLY? I HAVE ENOUGH PROOF TO SHOW THAT YOU KEPT IMPLYING THAT THERE CAN BE A THRESHOLD ABOVE WHICH THERE IS rEPO. SO LET'S SEE WHICH SIDE THE JUDGES AGREE WITH.


    CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!!!!!!



    FEEL FREE TO PHRASE IT ANY WAY YOU WANT. I'M DAMN SURE GOING TO SHOW WHAT YOU MEAN BY 'CAN'!



    ONLY 2 CHANGES.


    1. WE BOTH AGREE TO ALL OF THE JUDGES. NOT WE BOTH PICK ONE JUDGE, YOU DUMB FVVCK. THAT WOULD END IN A DRAW MOST LIKELY.

    2. PERMANENT BAN IS TO BE UPHELD BY THE MODS. AND IS JUST THAT. PERMANENT. NO USING AN ALT OF ANY KIND. EVER.



    CHALLENGE ACCEPTED. LET'S GO!

    Comment


      GET READY TO DAY GOODBYE, BlTCH

      Comment


        Travestyny, the DUCK, is DONE!!! COOKED!!!!


        Run DUCK, run!!!!



        QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!!!!


        Comment


          LOOK AT HIM RUN FROM ME



          Originally posted by travestyny
          OH IS THAT WHAT I WAS IMPLYING? REALLY? I HAVE ENOUGH PROOF TO SHOW THAT YOU KEPT IMPLYING THAT THERE CAN BE A THRESHOLD ABOVE WHICH THERE IS rEPO. SO LET'S SEE WHICH SIDE THE JUDGES AGREE WITH.


          CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!!!!!!



          FEEL FREE TO PHRASE IT ANY WAY YOU WANT. I'M DAMN SURE GOING TO SHOW WHAT YOU MEAN BY 'CAN'!



          ONLY 2 CHANGES.


          1. WE BOTH AGREE TO ALL OF THE JUDGES. NOT WE BOTH PICK ONE JUDGE, YOU DUMB FVVCK. THAT WOULD END IN A DRAW MOST LIKELY.

          2. PERMANENT BAN IS TO BE UPHELD BY THE MODS. AND IS JUST THAT. PERMANENT. NO USING AN ALT OF ANY KIND. EVER.



          CHALLENGE ACCEPTED. LET'S GO!


          WASSUP PVSSY BOY. COME GET IT!

          Comment


            Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
            that's typical travsB right there...

            he's gonna deflect since he doesnt want to accept your challenge.

            so what he does is, he brings up another question that was not apart of your challenge then he challenge you to debate the topic he just brought up and when you dont pay him no mind then he starts saying you're ducking him.

            it's the same ol' recycle trash from him. now he's gonna quote this and said he whooped on me before, etc.

            BINGO!!!!!

            SPOT ON!!!!!



            The DUCK did that for 90 page thread. Just the 2 of us going back and forth. All he did is what you said!!!!





            CLASSIC Travestyny, the DUCK!!!!





            They are laughing at your post.

            "I Travestyny, the DUCK, accept …… but on something other than the challenge!"

            .

            Comment


              Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
              [

              ****** isn't just a chicken he is roast chicken after you grilled him.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Vadrigar. View Post
                ****** isn't just a chicken he is roast chicken after you grilled him.

                YOU WISH BlTCH. YOUR BOY IS HAVING A CHANGE OF HEART



                CHALLENGE ACCEPTED IN THE THUNDERDOME. ADP IS REFUSING TO ACCEPT. WAITING FOR THE PVSSY ADP TO ACCEPT THE PERMANENT BAN CHALLENGE. LET'S GET IT ON!


                YOU ONLY GET ONE MORE CHANCE, ADP. ACCEPT YOUR CHALLENGE. I ACCEPT. I'M WAITINGGGGGGGGGGG!

                Comment


                  Proof that I accepted ADP02's challenge! Waitingggggggggg!!!!!

                  Originally posted by travestyny
                  oh is that what i was implying? Really? I have enough proof to show that you kept implying that there can be a threshold above which there is repo. So let's see which side the judges agree with.


                  challenge accepted!!!!!!



                  feel free to phrase it any way you want. I'm damn sure going to show what you mean by 'can'!



                  Only 2 changes.


                  1. We both agree to all of the judges. Not we both pick one judge, you dumb fvvck. That would end in a draw most likely.

                  2. Permanent ban is to be upheld by the mods. And is just that. Permanent. No using an alt of any kind. Ever.



                  challenge accepted. let's go!

                  Comment


                    WHERE YOU AT, ADP02? YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT 'CAN.' WELL LET'S TALK ABOUT 'CAN.'

                    Originally posted by travestyny
                    OH IS THAT WHAT I WAS IMPLYING? REALLY? I HAVE ENOUGH PROOF TO SHOW THAT YOU KEPT IMPLYING THAT THERE CAN BE A THRESHOLD ABOVE WHICH THERE IS rEPO. SO LET'S SEE WHICH SIDE THE JUDGES AGREE WITH.


                    CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!!!!!!



                    FEEL FREE TO PHRASE IT ANY WAY YOU WANT. I'M DAMN SURE GOING TO SHOW WHAT YOU MEAN BY 'CAN'!



                    ONLY 2 CHANGES.


                    1. WE BOTH AGREE TO ALL OF THE JUDGES. NOT WE BOTH PICK ONE JUDGE, YOU DUMB FVVCK. THAT WOULD END IN A DRAW MOST LIKELY.

                    2. PERMANENT BAN IS TO BE UPHELD BY THE MODS. AND IS JUST THAT. PERMANENT. NO USING AN ALT OF ANY KIND. EVER.



                    CHALLENGE ACCEPTED. LET'S GO!


                    WAITING!!!!!! ACCEPT YOUR CHALLENGE, SON. DON'T YOU DARE DUCK YOUR OWN CHALLENGE YOU LITTLE BlTCH. COME ON, CAN MAN!!!!


                    QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK!


                    [IMG]//media.*****.com/media/5T8tEJtCgvDuo/*****.gif[/IMG]

                    Comment


                      More fun statements from Travestyny.

                      No wonder that he is DUCKing the challenge!




                      ADP02
                      I have wada experts stating that there are threshold type tests.


                      how are those wada experts wrong?????
                      Travestyny

                      i did answer your question. They were corrected clearly by the court.






                      .

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP