Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[travestyny]

poor travestyny,

exposing that he did anything to avoid the challenge!!!!






No more bs wanted from duckville




travestyny,

after 2 months of arguing

after 90 page thread.



You just need to respond instead of avoiding and squirming

someone didn't answer the questionnnnnnn. Lmaooooooo. Is that more ducking son?


Are we allowed to decline vague challenges or not? Are you going to answer? Keep in mind.

i said no to a vague challenge . You know, just like you didn't want this current challenge to be vague!!!

if i don't see an answer to this....i'm going to assume you're just ducking again. Duck!!! Quack quack quack!!!!!

[travestyny]

2 MONTHS AND 90 PAGES???? DUDE, YOU BEEN CRYING ABOUT THE DEBATE FOR 1.5 YEARS AND YET YOU DECLINED THE REMATCH!!!!! LMAOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

BEAT THAT BlTCH!!!

EXPOSED!

2. DUCKING THE Rematch????

Can we now have a recount?

Actually there needs to be some changes ..... like ..... No Mayweather Mafia judges

.

OH YOU WANT A RECOUNT. NO YOU DON'T. IN ACTUALITY...

By the way, rematch whenever you like. You won't even respond to my offers for a rematch, because you know you don't stand a chance. Give up.

Would you accept a rematch against Travestyny in the Thunderdome?

But would you accept a rematch with Travestyny in the Thunderdome, with posters that you both agree on as the judges?

Would you be willing to rematch Travestyny in the Thunderdome with regular posters as judges, though?

there is no point asking.

What's up, pvssy? You going to answer? I mean, you keep claiming that you won and that I duped someone. But when I offered you a rematch, you renounced your statements!!!!!

That's called putting up the white flag, bltch You're done. Unless you want that rematch. Let me know, yea?

ADP DECLINED

YOU CAN'T WIN PVSSY!!!!

4-0!!!!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888


[img]//media.*****.com/media/3o7qDSOvfaCO9b3MlO/*****.gif[/IMG]

....but ADP02 STILL LIKE....

ADP, the 4-0 LOSING DUCK. QUACK!!!!!!!!!

IT'S OVER.
COME GET ME WHEN YOU DECIDE YOU WANT THAT REMATCH!

[travestyny]

SO TELL ME. WHO DUCKS MORE THAN ADP02. NO ONE!!!!!!!

EXPLAIN ALL THIS DUCKING SON!

EXPOSED!

1. DUCKING WHAT HE SPECIFICALLY SAID HE WOULD ACCEPT!

As I said, I would accept any bet on .....

the BAP test mentioned back then was a threshold type test. I say YES!!!!

ANY BET ON THAT HUH? LMAOOOOOO. IN REALITY....

Topic: In the case USADA vs. Bergman, the BAP test served as a threshold type test.

ADP DECLINED

You could have just said: Is the BAP test inherently a threshold test

ADP DECLINED!

TOPIC: THE CASE BERGMAN VS. USADA CONSISTED OF NO THRESHOLD CRITERIA.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IN THAT COURT CASE WAS A 80% THRESHOLD TEST.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IS INHERENTLY A THRESHOLD TEST, and had a threshold of 80% in the Bergman case!

ADP DECLINED

Just agree to the challenge.

So you're going to argue that in that case, the BAP is a threshold test, right? That's all I want to know.

Yes or no?

ADP ACCEPTED......AND THEN DECLINED ONE POST LATER!

EXPOSED!

2. DUCKING THE Rematch????

Can we now have a recount?

Actually there needs to be some changes ..... like ..... No Mayweather Mafia judges

.

OH YOU WANT A RECOUNT. NO YOU DON'T. IN ACTUALITY...

By the way, rematch whenever you like. You won't even respond to my offers for a rematch, because you know you don't stand a chance. Give up.

Would you accept a rematch against Travestyny in the Thunderdome?

But would you accept a rematch with Travestyny in the Thunderdome, with posters that you both agree on as the judges?

Would you be willing to rematch Travestyny in the Thunderdome with regular posters as judges, though?

there is no point asking.

What's up, pvssy? You going to answer? I mean, you keep claiming that you won and that I duped someone. But when I offered you a rematch, you renounced your statements!!!!!

That's called putting up the white flag, bltch You're done. Unless you want that rematch. Let me know, yea?

ADP DECLINED

EXPOSED!

3. DUCKING A REMATCH MEDIATED BY HIS BEST FRIEND SPOON???? HE WILL SURELY ACCEPT, RIGHT? I DID!

this is a new case. It's only the premise that is the same. All facts from the old kangaroo court is not admissible to court. You can present those facts again to the new judges, but is not accepted as truths. Only the new judges will decide if it is.

New judges will look at facts presented in a new light.

if it's out of scope then it is inadmissible duh??

don't forget the most important part that you agreed on travesty.

in that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using epo, it can be used.

any scope outside the topic is inadmissible if the new judges deem it to.

i accept.

BUT NOT ADP. IN ACTUALITY....

DO YOU ACCEPT THE REMATCH OR NOT???????? FVVCKING ACCEPT AND LET'S GET IT OVER WITH!

NO!!!

I said NO to a VAGUE CHALLENGE . You know, just like you didn't want this CURRENT CHALLENGE to be VAGUE!!!

EXPOSED!

4. Ducking his own challenge!

I'll tell you what.


Pay your debt from the last debate and admit that you lost.


I'll accept your challenge for permanent ban and all points.

Deal?

NOPE ...

EXPOSED!

5. Ducking his own challenge again!

[SIZE="4"]

THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE


Be a man, STOP the DUCKING!!!!

Let's make this even more clear for this ducking bltch.

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!

THIS IS NOT THE CHALLENGE THAT I REQUESTED!!!!!

BUT HIS QUOTATIONS ON THE MATTER SAY IT WAS EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS REQUESTING. LMAOOOO!

EXPOSED!

6. Ducking his own challenge again!

Travestyny, tell us all, was there just an image, that is all, Like you told the JUDGEs and ME a BILLION TIMES?


YES, those were THRESHOLD TYPE TESTs!!!!


GO TELL THAT TO THE JUDGES THAT YOU DUPED!!!!

STILL WAITING. ARE YOU GOING TO SAY THAT YOU DIDN'T SAY THE ABOVE?


YOU TOLD ME TO TELL IT TO THE JUDGES. WELL GUESS WHAT, BlTCH.

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!!!

WAITING FOR YOU TO ACCEPT!!!!!

Just trying to make this CLEAR.


My statement was for you to go apologize to the judges

AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY, THIS FOOL WAS JUST SAYING NO! BECAUSE HE'S A SCARED ****LESS DUCK!

THIS BlTCH DIDN'T WANT ANYTHING...AND THAT'S WHY HE GOT NOTHING. LMAOOOOO. NOW HE WILL FOREVER BE A 4-0 LOSING BlTCH. IT'S OVER PVSSY. PAY ME THE POINTS YOU OWE AND SHUT THE FVVCK UP!

CONGRATULATIONS, ADP. YOU'VE PROVEN THAT YOU ARE THE GRAND DUCK, AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT...OR ABOUT THIS.....

4-0!!!!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888


[img]//media.*****.com/media/3o7qDSOvfaCO9b3MlO/*****.gif[/IMG]

....but ADP02 STILL LIKE....

ADP, the 4-0 LOSING DUCK. QUACK!!!!!!!!!

IT'S OVER.
COME GET ME WHEN YOU DECIDE YOU WANT THAT REMATCH!

[ADP02]

someone didn't answer the questionnnnnnn. Lmaooooooo. Is that more ducking son?


Are we allowed to decline vague challenges or not? Are you going to answer? Keep in mind.





if i don't see an answer to this....i'm going to assume you're just ducking again. Duck!!! Quack quack quack!!!!!

Are you actually saying that you do not understand your own posts where you actually said were so CLEAR that there was NO WAY that you can make them any CLEARER?

Originally Posted by travestyny

I've answered this a million times. I told you that the WADA experts referred to the BAP as a threshold, but the CAS stated that it was in reality not a threshold.


I can't say that any more clearly.

Originally Posted by travestyny


1. Seems you backed off of your BAP talk.

I've explained this to you the same way the court explained it to the athlete. That you still can't understand is on you. The athlete never brings up threshold substances, but only points to a threshold for BAP. The court says clearly, there are no threshold criteria, because this is not a threshold substance.

Just like I told you. You tried to then say there could still be threshold criteria because of the BAP, but the court shut you down!!!! You were pushing so hard on your BAP crap

Originally Posted by travestyny
I've told you this a billion times in this very thread.

The Panel stated clearly that the BAP is not a threshold test.

You were the one who posted those CLEAR statements but now you do not understand them?








EXPOSED!!!!!!!!!




.

[travestyny]

are you actually saying that you do not understand your own posts where you actually said were so clear that there was no way that you can make them any clearer?


























you were the one who posted those clear statements but now you do not understand them?








exposed!!!!!!!!!




.

I accept on that statement. It is not a threshold. Are you ready. We have an understanding, right?


Are you ready. Don't you dare duck out again. You just stated it again. It is not a threshold criteria.


Do you accept?



LET'S SEE WHO GETS EXPOSED. DON'T DECLINE AGAIN. PERMANENT BAN AND ALL POINTS!

[ADP02]

I accept on that statement. It is not a threshold. Are you ready. We have an understanding, right?


Are you ready. Don't you dare duck out again. You just stated it again. It is not a threshold criteria.


Do you accept?



LET'S SEE WHO GETS EXPOSED. DON'T DECLINE AGAIN. PERMANENT BAN AND ALL POINTS!

So YOU ACCEPTED to the BELOW CLEAR RESPONSE from YOU.

GOOD.


I will post this in the DOME. Then we get the judges.

Question: You said it is not a threshold type test.
a) Why did BOTH sides call it a threshold test in that case that you referenced?
b) In my post, even WADA expert Segura calls it a threshold test. Was the expert wrong?
c) Others called it that too! Are they all wrong?

Travestyny

Question A, B, and C:
THE COURT FOR ARBITRATION OF SPORT HAS CORRECTED ANYONE THAT HAS EVER CALLED THIS A THRESHOLD TEST A NUMBER OF TIMES....BECAUSE IT IS NOT A THRESHOLD TEST!!!!!




THE ONLY THING THAT WAS EVER REFERRED TO AS A THRESHOLD WAS THE OLD WAY OF TESTING: THE BAP. AND THE COURT EVEN SAID THAT IS NOT A THRESHOLD TEST.

[travestyny]

so you accepted to the below clear response from you.

Good.


I will post this in the dome. Then we get the judges.

you will argue that it is inherently a threshold type test, right?


I will argue that it is not.

Clear. Right?


THIS IS GOING TO BE SO EASY!

[ADP02]

you will argue that it is inherently a threshold type test, right?


I will argue that it is not.

Clear. Right?


THIS IS GOING TO BE SO EASY!

You to defend your statements as you wish.

I take WADA EXPERTs words over yours any day of the year.

Question: You said it is not a threshold type test.
a) Why did BOTH sides call it a threshold test in that case that you referenced?
b) In my post, even WADA expert Segura calls it a threshold test. Was the expert wrong?
c) Others called it that too! Are they all wrong?

Travestyny

Question A, B, and C:
THE COURT FOR ARBITRATION OF SPORT HAS CORRECTED ANYONE THAT HAS EVER CALLED THIS A THRESHOLD TEST A NUMBER OF TIMES....BECAUSE IT IS NOT A THRESHOLD TEST!!!!!




THE ONLY THING THAT WAS EVER REFERRED TO AS A THRESHOLD WAS THE OLD WAY OF TESTING: THE BAP. AND THE COURT EVEN SAID THAT IS NOT A THRESHOLD TEST.

[travestyny]

You to defend your statements as you wish.

I take WADA EXPERTs words over yours any day of the year.

GO AHEAD. YOU ARE WELCOME TO TAKE THE WADA EXPERTS. I WILL TAKE THE COURT WHICH *****S ALL AND SAYS IT CLEARLY

"The fact is that the BAP and the other interpretative criteria are used to declare not a threshold of human body production but rather an image trom the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO. *Therefore, in the case of rEPO, there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance. *Rather there are criteria by which it can be said that what the image from this test procedure represents is rEPO.*"

EASY WORK

REMEMBER, PERMANENT BAN AND ALL POINTS. YOU ALSO ARE TO GIVE YOUR POINTS TO A NEUTRAL JUDGE. AND GIVE ME THE POINTS THAT YOU OWE FROM THE FIRST DEBATE!

[ADP02]

GO AHEAD. YOU ARE WELCOME TO TAKE THE WADA EXPERTS. I WILL TAKE THE COURT WHICH *****S ALL AND SAYS IT CLEARLY

"The fact is that the BAP and the other interpretative criteria are used to declare not a threshold of human body production but rather an image trom the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO. *Therefore, in the case of rEPO, there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance. *Rather there are criteria by which it can be said that what the image from this test procedure represents is rEPO.*"

EASY WORK

REMEMBER, PERMANENT BAN AND ALL POINTS. YOU ALSO ARE TO GIVE YOUR POINTS TO A NEUTRAL JUDGE. AND GIVE ME THE POINTS THAT YOU OWE FROM THE FIRST DEBATE!

I started the thread below



//krikya360.com/forums/s...6#post19040096