Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[travestyny]

More exposing. Explain this, son. Did you really decline a challenge because you claim it's vague....yet you say I have to accept your vague challenge?????

I said NO to a VAGUE CHALLENGE . You know, just like you didn't want this CURRENT CHALLENGE to be VAGUE!!!

EXPLAIN.

YOU CAN'T WIN, SON. EVERY TURN YOU TAKE YOU PROVE THAT YOU WERE ONE STEP BEHIND ME.

[ADP02]

You recapping all your DUCK moves to try to AVOID the challenge? I think you had about 20 DUCK moves!!!



REMINDER: Here is the 90 page thread that I started.


//krikya360.com/forums/s...9#post19039939

That's right, 90 pages!!!!




You keep on saying that you Accepted a challenge

but lets here it from you ….






Travestyny, will you ACCEPT this CHALLENGE?

from

[travestyny]

you recapping all your duck moves to try to avoid the challenge? I think you had about 20 duck moves!!!



Reminder: Here is the 90 page thread that i started.


//krikya360.com/forums/s...9#post19039939

that's right, 90 pages!!!!




you keep on saying that you accepted a challenge

but lets here it from you ….






travestyny, will you accept this challenge?

from

what i'm doing is exposing what you have to do so that you can sleep better at night....but it still won't work because.



I've accepted more challenges than you have. fact.

You declined a challenge for the same exact reason i declined yours. fact.


andddddd.....



I kicked your ass 4-0 and you can never ever do anything abouT it. Bahah!!

[travestyny]

EXPOSED!

DUCKING WHAT HE SPECIFICALLY SAID HE WOULD ACCEPT!

As I said, I would accept any bet on .....

the BAP test mentioned back then was a threshold type test. I say YES!!!!

ANY BET ON THAT HUH? LMAOOOOOO. IN REALITY....

Topic: In the case USADA vs. Bergman, the BAP test served as a threshold type test.

ADP DECLINED

You could have just said: Is the BAP test inherently a threshold test

ADP DECLINED!

TOPIC: THE CASE BERGMAN VS. USADA CONSISTED OF NO THRESHOLD CRITERIA.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IN THAT COURT CASE WAS A 80% THRESHOLD TEST.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IS INHERENTLY A THRESHOLD TEST, and had a threshold of 80% in the Bergman case!

ADP DECLINED

Just agree to the challenge.

So you're going to argue that in that case, the BAP is a threshold test, right? That's all I want to know.

Yes or no?

ADP ACCEPTED......AND THEN DECLINED ONE POST LATER!

EXPOSED!

DUCKING THE Rematch????

Can we now have a recount?

Actually there needs to be some changes ..... like ..... No Mayweather Mafia judges

.

OH YOU WANT A RECOUNT. NO YOU DON'T. IN ACTUALITY...

By the way, rematch whenever you like. You won't even respond to my offers for a rematch, because you know you don't stand a chance. Give up.

Would you accept a rematch against Travestyny in the Thunderdome?

But would you accept a rematch with Travestyny in the Thunderdome, with posters that you both agree on as the judges?

Would you be willing to rematch Travestyny in the Thunderdome with regular posters as judges, though?

there is no point asking.

What's up, pvssy? You going to answer? I mean, you keep claiming that you won and that I duped someone. But when I offered you a rematch, you renounced your statements!!!!!

That's called putting up the white flag, bltch You're done. Unless you want that rematch. Let me know, yea?

ADP DECLINED

EXPOSED!

DUCKING A REMATCH MEDIATED BY HIS BEST FRIEND SPOON???? HE WILL SURELY ACCEPT, RIGHT? I DID!

this is a new case. It's only the premise that is the same. All facts from the old kangaroo court is not admissible to court. You can present those facts again to the new judges, but is not accepted as truths. Only the new judges will decide if it is.

New judges will look at facts presented in a new light.

if it's out of scope then it is inadmissible duh??

don't forget the most important part that you agreed on travesty.

in that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using epo, it can be used.

any scope outside the topic is inadmissible if the new judges deem it to.

i accept.

BUT NOT ADP. IN ACTUALITY....

DO YOU ACCEPT THE REMATCH OR NOT???????? FVVCKING ACCEPT AND LET'S GET IT OVER WITH!

NO!!!

I said NO to a VAGUE CHALLENGE . You know, just like you didn't want this CURRENT CHALLENGE to be VAGUE!!!

EXPOSED!

Ducking his own challenge!

I'll tell you what.


Pay your debt from the last debate and admit that you lost.


I'll accept your challenge for permanent ban and all points.

Deal?

NOPE ...

[SIZE="4"]

THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE


Be a man, STOP the DUCKING!!!!

Let's make this even more clear for this ducking bltch.

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!

THIS IS NOT THE CHALLENGE THAT I REQUESTED!!!!!

BUT HIS QUOTATIONS ON THE MATTER SAY IT WAS EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS REQUESTING. LMAOOOO!

AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY, THIS FOOL WAS JUST SAYING NO! BECAUSE HE'S A SCARED ****LESS DUCK!

THIS BlTCH DIDN'T WANT ANYTHING...AND THAT'S WHY HE GOT NOTHING. LMAOOOOO. NOW HE WILL FOREVER BE A 4-0 LOSING BlTCH. IT'S OVER PVSSY. PAY ME THE POINTS YOU OWE AND SHUT THE FVVCK UP!

CONGRATULATIONS, ADP. YOU'VE PROVEN THAT YOU ARE THE GRAND DUCK, AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT...OR ABOUT THIS.....

4-0!!!!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888


[img]//media.*****.com/media/3o7qDSOvfaCO9b3MlO/*****.gif[/IMG]

....but ADP02 STILL LIKE....

ADP, the 4-0 LOSING DUCK. QUACK!!!!!!!!!

IT'S OVER.
COME GET ME WHEN YOU DECIDE YOU WANT THAT REMATCH!

[ADP02]

We are not asking you how many of your own make believe challenges that you looked in the mirror and accepted. JUST TO AVOID THE CHALLENGE … DUCKER!!!!



I'm asking you about the CHALLENGE that I placed.






REMINDER: Here is the 90 page thread that I started.


//krikya360.com/forums/s...9#post19039939

That's right, 90 pages!!!!




You keep on saying that you Accepted a challenge

but lets here it from you ….






Travestyny, will you ACCEPT this CHALLENGE?

from

AGAIN


DID YOU


ACCEPT



MY



CHALLENGE?????

[travestyny]

EXPLAIN!

EXPOSED!

1. DUCKING WHAT HE SPECIFICALLY SAID HE WOULD ACCEPT!

As I said, I would accept any bet on .....

the BAP test mentioned back then was a threshold type test. I say YES!!!!

ANY BET ON THAT HUH? LMAOOOOOO. IN REALITY....

Topic: In the case USADA vs. Bergman, the BAP test served as a threshold type test.

ADP DECLINED

You could have just said: Is the BAP test inherently a threshold test

ADP DECLINED!

TOPIC: THE CASE BERGMAN VS. USADA CONSISTED OF NO THRESHOLD CRITERIA.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IN THAT COURT CASE WAS A 80% THRESHOLD TEST.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IS INHERENTLY A THRESHOLD TEST, and had a threshold of 80% in the Bergman case!

ADP DECLINED

Just agree to the challenge.

So you're going to argue that in that case, the BAP is a threshold test, right? That's all I want to know.

Yes or no?

ADP ACCEPTED......AND THEN DECLINED ONE POST LATER!

EXPOSED!

2. DUCKING THE Rematch????

Can we now have a recount?

Actually there needs to be some changes ..... like ..... No Mayweather Mafia judges

.

OH YOU WANT A RECOUNT. NO YOU DON'T. IN ACTUALITY...

By the way, rematch whenever you like. You won't even respond to my offers for a rematch, because you know you don't stand a chance. Give up.

Would you accept a rematch against Travestyny in the Thunderdome?

But would you accept a rematch with Travestyny in the Thunderdome, with posters that you both agree on as the judges?

Would you be willing to rematch Travestyny in the Thunderdome with regular posters as judges, though?

there is no point asking.

What's up, pvssy? You going to answer? I mean, you keep claiming that you won and that I duped someone. But when I offered you a rematch, you renounced your statements!!!!!

That's called putting up the white flag, bltch You're done. Unless you want that rematch. Let me know, yea?

ADP DECLINED

EXPOSED!

3. DUCKING A REMATCH MEDIATED BY HIS BEST FRIEND SPOON???? HE WILL SURELY ACCEPT, RIGHT? I DID!

this is a new case. It's only the premise that is the same. All facts from the old kangaroo court is not admissible to court. You can present those facts again to the new judges, but is not accepted as truths. Only the new judges will decide if it is.

New judges will look at facts presented in a new light.

if it's out of scope then it is inadmissible duh??

don't forget the most important part that you agreed on travesty.

in that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using epo, it can be used.

any scope outside the topic is inadmissible if the new judges deem it to.

i accept.

BUT NOT ADP. IN ACTUALITY....

DO YOU ACCEPT THE REMATCH OR NOT???????? FVVCKING ACCEPT AND LET'S GET IT OVER WITH!

NO!!!

I said NO to a VAGUE CHALLENGE . You know, just like you didn't want this CURRENT CHALLENGE to be VAGUE!!!

EXPOSED!

4. Ducking his own challenge!

I'll tell you what.


Pay your debt from the last debate and admit that you lost.


I'll accept your challenge for permanent ban and all points.

Deal?

NOPE ...

[SIZE="4"]

THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE


Be a man, STOP the DUCKING!!!!

Let's make this even more clear for this ducking bltch.

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!

THIS IS NOT THE CHALLENGE THAT I REQUESTED!!!!!

BUT HIS QUOTATIONS ON THE MATTER SAY IT WAS EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS REQUESTING. LMAOOOO!

EXPOSED!

5. Ducking his own challenge again!

Travestyny, tell us all, was there just an image, that is all, Like you told the JUDGEs and ME a BILLION TIMES?


YES, those were THRESHOLD TYPE TESTs!!!!


GO TELL THAT TO THE JUDGES THAT YOU DUPED!!!!

STILL WAITING. ARE YOU GOING TO SAY THAT YOU DIDN'T SAY THE ABOVE?


YOU TOLD ME TO TELL IT TO THE JUDGES. WELL GUESS WHAT, BlTCH.

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!!!

WAITING FOR YOU TO ACCEPT!!!!!

AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY, THIS FOOL WAS JUST SAYING NO! BECAUSE HE'S A SCARED ****LESS DUCK!

THIS BlTCH DIDN'T WANT ANYTHING...AND THAT'S WHY HE GOT NOTHING. LMAOOOOO. NOW HE WILL FOREVER BE A 4-0 LOSING BlTCH. IT'S OVER PVSSY. PAY ME THE POINTS YOU OWE AND SHUT THE FVVCK UP!

CONGRATULATIONS, ADP. YOU'VE PROVEN THAT YOU ARE THE GRAND DUCK, AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT...OR ABOUT THIS.....

4-0!!!!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888


[img]//media.*****.com/media/3o7qDSOvfaCO9b3MlO/*****.gif[/IMG]

....but ADP02 STILL LIKE....

ADP, the 4-0 LOSING DUCK. QUACK!!!!!!!!!

IT'S OVER.
COME GET ME WHEN YOU DECIDE YOU WANT THAT REMATCH!

[ADP02]

Travestyny, the CLOWN, C/P BS nonsense.






I'm asking you about the CHALLENGE below.






REMINDER: Here is the 90 page thread that I started based on a 2 month ARGUMENT!!!!



//krikya360.com/forums/s...9#post19039939

That's right, 90 pages!!!!




You keep on saying that you Accepted a challenge

but lets here it from you ….






Travestyny, will you ACCEPT this CHALLENGE?

from

AGAIN


DID YOU


ACCEPT



MY



CHALLENGE?????

[travestyny]

EXPLAIN ALL THIS DUCKING SON!

EXPOSED!

1. DUCKING WHAT HE SPECIFICALLY SAID HE WOULD ACCEPT!

As I said, I would accept any bet on .....

the BAP test mentioned back then was a threshold type test. I say YES!!!!

ANY BET ON THAT HUH? LMAOOOOOO. IN REALITY....

Topic: In the case USADA vs. Bergman, the BAP test served as a threshold type test.

ADP DECLINED

You could have just said: Is the BAP test inherently a threshold test

ADP DECLINED!

TOPIC: THE CASE BERGMAN VS. USADA CONSISTED OF NO THRESHOLD CRITERIA.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IN THAT COURT CASE WAS A 80% THRESHOLD TEST.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IS INHERENTLY A THRESHOLD TEST, and had a threshold of 80% in the Bergman case!

ADP DECLINED

Just agree to the challenge.

So you're going to argue that in that case, the BAP is a threshold test, right? That's all I want to know.

Yes or no?

ADP ACCEPTED......AND THEN DECLINED ONE POST LATER!

EXPOSED!

2. DUCKING THE Rematch????

Can we now have a recount?

Actually there needs to be some changes ..... like ..... No Mayweather Mafia judges

.

OH YOU WANT A RECOUNT. NO YOU DON'T. IN ACTUALITY...

By the way, rematch whenever you like. You won't even respond to my offers for a rematch, because you know you don't stand a chance. Give up.

Would you accept a rematch against Travestyny in the Thunderdome?

But would you accept a rematch with Travestyny in the Thunderdome, with posters that you both agree on as the judges?

Would you be willing to rematch Travestyny in the Thunderdome with regular posters as judges, though?

there is no point asking.

What's up, pvssy? You going to answer? I mean, you keep claiming that you won and that I duped someone. But when I offered you a rematch, you renounced your statements!!!!!

That's called putting up the white flag, bltch You're done. Unless you want that rematch. Let me know, yea?

ADP DECLINED

EXPOSED!

3. DUCKING A REMATCH MEDIATED BY HIS BEST FRIEND SPOON???? HE WILL SURELY ACCEPT, RIGHT? I DID!

this is a new case. It's only the premise that is the same. All facts from the old kangaroo court is not admissible to court. You can present those facts again to the new judges, but is not accepted as truths. Only the new judges will decide if it is.

New judges will look at facts presented in a new light.

if it's out of scope then it is inadmissible duh??

don't forget the most important part that you agreed on travesty.

in that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using epo, it can be used.

any scope outside the topic is inadmissible if the new judges deem it to.

i accept.

BUT NOT ADP. IN ACTUALITY....

DO YOU ACCEPT THE REMATCH OR NOT???????? FVVCKING ACCEPT AND LET'S GET IT OVER WITH!

NO!!!

I said NO to a VAGUE CHALLENGE . You know, just like you didn't want this CURRENT CHALLENGE to be VAGUE!!!

EXPOSED!

4. Ducking his own challenge!

I'll tell you what.


Pay your debt from the last debate and admit that you lost.


I'll accept your challenge for permanent ban and all points.

Deal?

NOPE ...

EXPOSED!

5. Ducking his own challenge again!

[SIZE="4"]

THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE


Be a man, STOP the DUCKING!!!!

Let's make this even more clear for this ducking bltch.

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!

THIS IS NOT THE CHALLENGE THAT I REQUESTED!!!!!

BUT HIS QUOTATIONS ON THE MATTER SAY IT WAS EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS REQUESTING. LMAOOOO!

EXPOSED!

6. Ducking his own challenge again!

Travestyny, tell us all, was there just an image, that is all, Like you told the JUDGEs and ME a BILLION TIMES?


YES, those were THRESHOLD TYPE TESTs!!!!


GO TELL THAT TO THE JUDGES THAT YOU DUPED!!!!

STILL WAITING. ARE YOU GOING TO SAY THAT YOU DIDN'T SAY THE ABOVE?


YOU TOLD ME TO TELL IT TO THE JUDGES. WELL GUESS WHAT, BlTCH.

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!!!

WAITING FOR YOU TO ACCEPT!!!!!

AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY, THIS FOOL WAS JUST SAYING NO! BECAUSE HE'S A SCARED ****LESS DUCK!

THIS BlTCH DIDN'T WANT ANYTHING...AND THAT'S WHY HE GOT NOTHING. LMAOOOOO. NOW HE WILL FOREVER BE A 4-0 LOSING BlTCH. IT'S OVER PVSSY. PAY ME THE POINTS YOU OWE AND SHUT THE FVVCK UP!

CONGRATULATIONS, ADP. YOU'VE PROVEN THAT YOU ARE THE GRAND DUCK, AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT...OR ABOUT THIS.....

4-0!!!!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888


[img]//media.*****.com/media/3o7qDSOvfaCO9b3MlO/*****.gif[/IMG]

....but ADP02 STILL LIKE....

ADP, the 4-0 LOSING DUCK. QUACK!!!!!!!!!

IT'S OVER.
COME GET ME WHEN YOU DECIDE YOU WANT THAT REMATCH!

[travestyny]

I'm asking you about the CHALLENGE below.

I told you it's too vague. You know. Just like you said about this one, right?

I said NO to a VAGUE CHALLENGE . You know, just like you didn't want this CURRENT CHALLENGE to be VAGUE!!!

SO YOU TELL ME. ARE WE ALLOWED TO DECLINE VAGUE CHALLENGES OR NOT? I'LL WAIT FOR YOUR REPLY.

EXPOSED!

YOU CAN'T WIN, PVSSY!

[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[ADP02]

Poor Travestyny,

EXPOSING that he did anything to AVOID the CHALLENGE!!!!






NO more BS wanted from DUCKVILLE




TRAVESTYNY,

After 2 months of arguing

After 90 page thread.



You just need to respond instead of AVOIDING and SQUIRMING