Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[Spoon23]

I just want to take a moment to recognize Spoon for his attempt to turn over a new leaf.

Nope. No turning over. You are just too dumb realise how a court works hahaha!!

Originally Posted by ADP02
2) WHILE OUT OF SCOPE, this specific criteria had an "and/OR" in which the panel was describing. In that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using EPO, it can be used.


Funny thing is that ADP recently has been saying this is suddenly in scope. Hmmmmm. Well it's hard to argue that, being that the quotation was confirmed to be legit, even by him. So I wondered what Spoon had to say about this. I thought he would find some way to be as dishonest as ADP. NOPE! Check it out!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoon23 View Post
If it's out of scope then it is inadmissible duh??



ADP02 CLEARLY mentions, however, In that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using EPO, it can be used.


Thus I, Spoon23 also mentioned. Any scope outside the topic is inadmissible if the NEW JUDGES deem it to. And if the "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that ties the athlete was using EPO. Then it is relevant and very much admissable to court.

Why is it so hard to understand TravestyNY All you have to do is create a premise of the scope of your defence. You just choose your side. Simple. It's the Judges not you or ADP02 will decided if ADP02 or You Travesty have any relevant evidence to justify your argument. You just have to present your facts, In the end, since you don't get it. It's not ADP02 or you who will decide if your points have merit or not. Judges will decide that.

It's so simple, but it seems. All you do Travesty is biatch and move the goal post like your hero Froid Roid.

All you need to do is create the premise of the scope of your argument. IT IS THE JUDGES WHO WILL DECIDE IF IT IS OUT OF SCOPE OR NOT. NOT YOU! YOU NITWIT HAHAHAHAHA!!!

[travestyny]

All you need to do is create the premise of the scope of your argument. IT IS THE JUDGES WHO WILL DECIDE IF IT IS OUT OF SCOPE OR NOT.

EXACTLY. HAHAHAHAHA. YOU KEEP SHlTTING ALL OVER ADP02


Go tell that to him so he stops ducking. Bahahahahaha!!!!

You two are like dumb and dumber!!!!

[Spoon23]

EXACTLY. HAHAHAHAHA. [/MENTION]


Thus I, Spoon23 also mentioned. Any scope outside the topic is inadmissible if the NEW JUDGES deem it to. And if the "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that ties the athlete was using EPO. Then it is relevant and very much admissable to court.

Yes EXACTLY! But I'm not ****ting on my main man ADP02. I'm actually ****ting on your dumbass arguments that you have no idea where you are at anymore from all that spinning of unnecessary nonsense after nonsense that seems to never end lolololol

Now its time to get on with this charade Travesty, unless. You are biatching out again hahaha!!


DUCKER IN THE HOUSE!!!!!! PUT UP OR SHUT UP BIATCH HAHAHAHA

[travestyny]

Yes EXACTLY! But I'm not ****ting on my main man ADP02. I'm actually ****ting on your dumbass arguments that you have no idea where you are at anymore from all that spinning of unnecessary nonsense after nonsense that seems to never end lolololol

Now its time to get on with this charade Travesty, unless. You are biatching out again hahaha!!


DUCKER IN THE HOUSE!!!!!! PUT UP OR SHUT UP BIATCH HAHAHAHA

Oh, is it this one? That’s what your boy said a year ago. Ask him if he still believes this!!!!

SCOPE that YOU agreed on: Does the EPO technical document refer to threshold criteria?

STOP SHlTTING ALL OVER ADP. HE’S ALREADY DEAD!!!!

[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[Spoon23]

Oh, is it this one? That’s what your boy said a year ago. Ask him if he still believes this!!!!

EXACTLY. HAHAHAHAHA. [/MENTION]


Thus I, Spoon23 also mentioned. Any scope outside the topic is inadmissible if the NEW JUDGES deem it to. And if the "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that ties the athlete was using EPO. Then it is relevant and very much admissable to court.

It's sealed. You've agreed. It's time to walk the walk.


EXACTLY


[IMG]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/IMG]

[travestyny]

It's sealed. You've agreed. It's time to walk the walk.


EXACTLY


[IMG]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/IMG]

Jesus Christ you are a dummy.

Yep, I agreed. I told your boy he could use any additional information he wants!. Now get your boy to agree

[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[Spoon23]

Jesus Christ you are a dummy.

Yep, I agreed. I told your boy he could use any additional information he wants!. Now get your boy to agree

lololololol

You can't even define your argument.

Like I said. I'm here to start the thread and post the Premise of each side and the rules of this debate. I won't be the judge, but I'll certainly be the one to create the guidelines of this debate.

Stop yapping. And define your side. Write it down in the other thread. I'm already getting this in motion.

All you do is make up silly, nonsense posturing. Move your biatch ass!

[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[travestyny]

lololololol

You can't even define your argument.

Like I said. I'm here to start the thread and post the Premise of each side and the rules of this debate. I won't be the judge, but I'll certainly be the one to create the guidelines of this debate.

Stop yapping. And define your side. Write it down in the other thread. I'm already getting this in motion.

All you do is make up silly, nonsense posturing. Move your biatch ass!

[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

NOPE. Don't think of bltching out.


YOU ARE A PARTICIPATE AND I'M WAITING FOR YOU TO ACCEPT THE PERMANENT BAN, ALL POINTS BET!

You wanted to be in....YOU GOT IT! THANKS FOR STEPPING UP.


Let's see you defend all of the BLATANT LIES that I caught your boy in. I'm ready. I ACCEPT. Waiting for you to accept.


DON'T YOU DARE THINK ABOUT BlTCHING OUT. ARE YOU IN OR NOT?

[Vadrigar.]

Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.

He pu$$ied out.

The biatch pu$$ied out.

It's over.

Flawless victory.





















[img]//media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

KABOOM!

[travestyny]

Breaking News:
ADP02 bows out of rematch, essentially admitting to being the rightful loser -- still refuses to pay debt.

Spoon23 happy to escape going along for the imminent permanent ban. Lucky to escape with only destroying his life's work by admitting Mayweather beat Pacquiao.

Vagasil (aka PARALLELOGRAM VIAGRA), still a f@ggot.

DO YOU ACCEPT OR NOT???????? FVVCKING ACCEPT AND LET'S GET IT OVER WITH!

NO!!!

Did they just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes they did.

They pu$$ied out.

The biatches pu$$ied out.

It's over.

Flawless victory.





















[img]//media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

KABOOM!

So long, bltches.

[IMG]//media.*****.com/media/3o7qDSOvfaCO9b3MlO/*****.gif[/IMG]