Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
View Post
Out of all the judges, Billeau2 to me appeared to be the most objective and yes, even though he voted for me!
Billeau2 appeared to be a very busy guy but at least he tried to place some rules and standards.
When I read his analysis the other day, I realized that it was clearly wrong due to 2 points.
1) He brought up a topic in which both Travestyny and myself said was out of scope. That comprised of a good 80% of his analysis as to why Travestyny should win .
2) Billeau2 thought that Travestyny showed him that WADA said MRPL=parameters=EPO testing.
I showed that that is completely false using WADA documentation.
unfortunately, Billeau2 has not come back, so he has no idea about that.
Finally, when Billeau2 posted, he said does anyone have any questions. Well, for sure I do and its more than a question .... It's to show that travestyny was incorrect.
and to tell him what the scope that we agreed to was about ..... it was not about threshold substances!!!
Oh and there is one person who can tell you all of this and his name is Travestyny but all he cares is about winning at all costs!!!
I do not care about points. I could have given it to him even if win .... it's the principle not the points.
.
Comment