Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[tangalog2200]

I don't agree. Every round.. Please!! Please. I want to give my opinion. Even the rounds PAC won need to be questioned. We need to be objective! All the way.

"I want to give my opinion"

now, again, i have to put you to the test, buddy....

you HAVE ALREADY given your opinion that pac lost even in SLOW MO...

that was why i asked YOU to SHOW ME....for you MUST HAVE proof of such claim...

YOU now asking for videos? I wonder!

[Zaroku]

Naah.. Silly me to take you seriously.

Carry on..

Next..

What could it hurt to try. I already sent you a PM telling you Floyd cheated with his ex post facto TUE??? I voted that he cheated. That is rather clear.

Yet you don't trust me to do a round by round analysis??

What could it hurt???

Gimme a chance, round by round, real time and slow motion.

I don't want to believe a ****ing thing that is wrong. 750 ml, ex post facto TUE.... Bull crap. Over. End of the story.

[Zaroku]

"I want to give my opinion"

now, again, i have to put you to the test, buddy....

you HAVE ALREADY given your opinion that pac lost even in SLOW MO...

that was why i asked YOU to SHOW ME....for you MUST HAVE proof of such claim...

YOU now asking for videos? I wonder!

In the videos you guys have proffered, those rounds could have gone either way.

I want a round by round breakdown. I prefer watching them in cronoligical order.

My methodology will be this.
1. Watch each round in real time. Score it.
2. Watch in slow motion.. Score it.
3. Submit results even if they conflict

Willing to take suggestions!

Additionally I can provide the reasons why I scored each round.
I would have taken a point or two from Floyd for excessive holding. 1 pt for sure.

[Spoon23]

What could it hurt to try. I already sent you a PM telling you Floyd cheated with his ex post facto TUE??? I voted that he cheated. That is rather clear.

Yet you don't trust me to do a round by round analysis??

What could it hurt???

Gimme a chance, round by round, real time and slow motion.

I don't want to believe a ****ing thing that is wrong. 750 ml, ex post facto TUE.... Bull crap. Over. End of the story.

Your going around in circles bud.

This thread is about those 5 videos. Dispute it or not. It's your choice.

Don't complicate what is simple.

You go to my lair. It means its suppose to be about the thread topic. You either agree or disagree. If you disagree then dispute those videos.

If you don't want to dispute and just want to talk silly then just keep trolling.

[Zaroku]

Your going around in circles bud.

This thread is about those 5 videos. Dispute it or not. It's your choice.

Don't complicate what is simple.

You go to my lair. It means its suppose to be about the thread topic. You either agree or disagree. If you disagree then dispute those videos.

If you don't want to dispute and just want to talk silly then just keep trolling.

I am no troll. But it is your lair, you set the context. I am looking into other anomalies. This crap should be well established. Score cards. Etc. TUE, 750 ml, wtf...

Anyway it is your lair, you set the narrow context.... Your show.

[Spoon23]

I am no troll. But it is your lair, you set the context. I am looking into other anomalies. This crap should be well established. Score cards. Etc. TUE, 750 ml, wtf...

Anyway it is your lair, you set the narrow context.... Your show.

I see. Okay I guess

[Zaroku]

"I want to give my opinion"

now, again, i have to put you to the test, buddy....

you HAVE ALREADY given your opinion that pac lost even in SLOW MO...

that was why i asked YOU to SHOW ME....for you MUST HAVE proof of such claim...

YOU now asking for videos? I wonder!

I already asked spoon for a round by round, for each of the 12 rounds.

He only wants to question the rounds Floyd won. Not each and every round.

Now who is biased???

[tangalog2200]

I already asked spoon for a round by round, for each of the 12 rounds.

He only wants to question the rounds Floyd won. Not each and every round.

Now who is biased???

i am not interested on who is biased...

i can see your point in asking for more videos...

but what i would like say, request that you do is simply prove spoon wrong, even on one video he presented...

that will be like looking at the right hand jmm gifted pac...yes?

[Zaroku]

i am not interested on who is biased...

i can see your point in asking for more videos...

but what i would like say, request that you do is simply prove spoon wrong, even on one video he presented...

that will be like looking at the right hand jmm gifted pac...yes?

For you. Ok. But not that crap video. Which round???

Just gimme a number and I will watch that round.

[tangalog2200]

For you. Ok. But not that crap video. Which round???

Just gimme a number and I will watch that round.

"but what i would like say, request that you do is simply prove spoon wrong, even on one video he presented..."

as your buddy, i give you the freedom of choice from the 5 videos spoon presented....

just prove spoon wrong once and i will consider him wrong in all 5...fair enough?