Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[Rath]

You are the one with the conspiracy theory about the corners. Would you like to find the form and post it? Please do.

what conspiracy theories are you talking about?

the form you presented is right there.

everything i mentioned was base on the form.

i did not make assumption or speculation.

what are you talking about?

[travestyny]

what conspiracy theories are you talking about?

the form you presented is right there.

everything i mentioned was base on the form.

i did not make assumption or speculation.

what are you talking about?

Oh my god. Did you not say that the fight was scored for the Red corner, and Pacquaio was in the red corner? Haven't you been saying that for months and months? (way too long).

What was your point about that if you don't even believe the form you saw is accurate? What form are you basing it on? Stop trying to squirm out of it and say what you believe, or stop saying the fight was scored for the red corner and insinuating that means Pacquaio should have been the winner.

Man up or stop bringing up the corner crap. Simple and plain.

[Johnwoo8686]

Lets all pitch in and buy Spoon one of these:

[Rath]

You are the one with the conspiracy theory about the corners. Would you like to find the form and post it? Please do.

from your evidence:

the form was photocopy and not the original copy - check

the form don't have NSAC Logo - check

there were no signatories on the photocopied mimeograph printed form - check

the photocopy form is a mimeograph printed form - check

the final score says red corner won - check

now where is the conspiracy theory you are talking about?

too easy you say

did i man up enough or you are now trying to divert and deflect from the topic?

are we still talking about conspiracy here or you are on another topic now?

if we are still in the conspiracy theory, prove where is the conspiracy that i made.

[travestyny]

from your evidence:

the form was photocopy and not the original copy - check

the form don't have NSAC Logo - check

there were no signatories on the photocopied mimeograph printed form - check

the photocopy form is a mimeograph printed form - check

the final score says red corner won - check

now where is the conspiracy theory you are talking about?

too easy you say

did i man up enough or you are now trying to divert and deflect from the topic?

are we still talking about conspiracy here or you are on another topic now?

if we are still in the conspiracy theory, prove where is the conspiracy that i made.

So tell me what's your point, since you keep evading the question.

Do you believe the judges scored the fight for Pacquaio, but the wrong winner was declared?

It's a very simple question.

[Rath]

So tell me what's your point, since you keep evading the question.

Do you believe the judges scored the fight for Pacquaio, but the wrong winner was declared?

It's a very simple question.

before i answer your question. you still not addressed the first point we are talking about.
where is the conspiracy theory that you are accusing me off?

don't you worry i will attend to your question once we settle this one up.

[travestyny]

before i answer your question. you still not addressed the first point we are talking about.
where is the conspiracy theory that you are accusing me off?

don't you worry i will attend to your question once we settle this one up.

Man, I've said it over and over. Seems like you are saying the judges had the fight for Pacquaio since he was in the red corner. I can't be any more clear than that.

Did you not say something was "fishy?" You know the conspiracy theory I'm referring to. Don't make me repost your past statements.

[Rath]

Man, I've said it over and over. Seems like you are saying the judges had the fight for Pacquaio since he was in the red corner. I can't be any more clear than that.

Did you not say something was "fishy?" You know the conspiracy theory I'm referring to. Don't make me repost your past statements.

i told you i don't know who tallied the final score.

but it says red corner won.

was it based on judges individual score cards?

was there a mistake made by the man/woman who tallied the final score?

no one knows for certain.

but what i am certain is that my reply was based on the evidence you presented.

back to the first question where is the conspiracy theory you said i made?

[travestyny]

They intentionally made the form wrong.

because they are not sure if the judges will play by the agreement.

it was a win-win situation.

judges scores it for red Floyd wins - (Floyd name was on the red corner)

judges scored it for Blue Floyd still wins. - (Floyd was actually on the Blue corner)

that Floyd over the R corner does not correspond to a mistake were Floyd is on the red corner.

it was on the slot where it says who is fighting that night, not who was in what corner.

Floyd vs Pac is what it says, Floyd being billed first that is why his name was there over the R corner.

you got it? or you are too smart you did not notice?

Hmm. Is that enough conspiracy theory for you? First they intentionally made the form "wrong", but as you try to wiggle out of your little conspiracy theory, now it wasn't wrong.

Should I keep embarrassing you?

[Rath]

Hmm. Is that enough conspiracy theory for you? First they intentionally made the form "wrong", but as you try to wiggle out of your little conspiracy theory, now it wasn't wrong.

Should I keep embarrassing you?

i did not wiggle out

you are right i said they intentionally made the form wrong.

by making it look like Floyd's name was over the red corner and Pac on the blue.

see that is why i told you it was a win win situation.

if judges played by the agreement and scored it for Floyd. the one who tallies the final score would put it on blue.

if there is someone who's gonna complain but Pac in the form was on blue so Pac won.

NSAC would simply says no the name above does not correspond to the assigned corner but who were fighting for that event.

if those judges did not play by the agreement and scored it for red where it was Pac's corner

the winner is still floyd because they will simply say look at the final score in the final form the red corner won clearly and what was the name over the red corner? Floyd is it not?

but but but Pac was on the red corner?

NSAC will again simply says there were mistakes in assigning the corner but the judging and the form was correct.

win win situation is it not?

was that what happen? or not?

the final form surfaces and look at the answer given by the commission?

where was the conspiracy theory?

now to answer your question?

if you are one of those judge, would you stand up go inside the ring and complain and try to correct buffer of what happen, when the only thing you know and is certain is your score and not the other two judges?

after a day or two and you found out that there was a mistake in the announcement would you stand up?