Neck. It must be important, pedastel of the head. Wow! Remember the neck on Roy Jones when he stepped up to heavyweight? How about the tree trunk where reposed the head of Holyfield after stepping to heavyweight? Holy could take a punch and Roy couldn't.
I am trying to think of a fighter without an outstanding neck who could really take a punch. That seems to be most of them, really. I cannot recall anything outstanding about Lamotta's neck, or Robinson's, either. They had regular, good necks for athletes, maybe a little more because they were boxers, but not the tree trunks that you see on many modern boxers.
That begs a question. Are these tree trunks, which are only found on modern boxers, the result of some quirk or vogue on the part of trainers? Are they really necessary, or are they an example of trainers gone wild, gone overboard on a trend with no known advantage simply because it looks good, seems right, or keeps them looking useful?
Or is there a physical law which says the more neck the better on a fighter?
I am trying to think of a fighter without an outstanding neck who could really take a punch. That seems to be most of them, really. I cannot recall anything outstanding about Lamotta's neck, or Robinson's, either. They had regular, good necks for athletes, maybe a little more because they were boxers, but not the tree trunks that you see on many modern boxers.
That begs a question. Are these tree trunks, which are only found on modern boxers, the result of some quirk or vogue on the part of trainers? Are they really necessary, or are they an example of trainers gone wild, gone overboard on a trend with no known advantage simply because it looks good, seems right, or keeps them looking useful?
Or is there a physical law which says the more neck the better on a fighter?
Comment