whos jab had more of an affect on a person tyson,foreman or liston???

[Verstyle]

at least we agree on something.

hmmmmmmm go figure u pick liston. wooooooooooo heeeeeewwww

[butterfly1964]

hmmmmmmm go figure u pick liston. wooooooooooo heeeeeewwww

tyson's jabs couldn't hold a candle to liston's jab and you know it.

[Verstyle]

tyson's jabs couldn't hold a candle to liston's jab and you know it.

the key word was AFFECTIVE.not hard.

[butterfly1964]

the key word was AFFECTIVE.not hard.

i still think it was more effectiv, cause liston did some terrible things to people with his jab.

[JDizzle79]

and you've been doing some terrible things posting on this site...you make my brain hurt

[GunStar]

Holmes Jab was the best in the HW history, but I think Liston was the best from these 3, Foremon second & Tyson third.

Tyson was not a good jabber, he rarely used it & it was not that effective.

[Southpaw Stinger]

Liston has probably the best jab in heavyweight history and easily dominates that list.
It goes;
1. Liston
2. Foreman

3. Tyson

[Verstyle]

Holmes Jab was the best in the HW history, but I think Liston was the best from these 3, Foremon second & Tyson third.

Tyson was not a good jabber, he rarely used it & it was not that effective.

not that afective. well can u tell me how he got in 90% of the times if it wasnt affective.

[Southpaw Stinger]

well can u tell me how he got in 90% of the times if it wasnt affective.

He didn't throw it that often so connection percentage was high.

[Verstyle]

He didn't throw it that often so connection percentage was high.

guys guys guys. i said AFFECTIVE. tyson had to get in some how to use his hooks. so wouldnt that mean that his jab even if it didnt connect was a good way to get inside.and he didnt really use it to hit ppl he used it to get in. as u can see in his 80s fights alot of his jabs r very slow cause he is jus using it as a tool to get in