Hi one and all!
This is my first ever thread so excuse me for any beginner errors. I apologise in advance and hopefully I'll get the hang of it.
I recently went through my top 5 'pound for pound' of all times list with some friends. I had Ray Robinson at the top of the pile with Harry Greb relatively close in second place. Muhammad Ali went in at 5th place which left me struggling to place Willie Pep and Henry Armstrong. I eventually went with Henry as third greatest of all time leaving Willie in 4th.
My question is who do you think was the 1) better boxer/fighter 2) who had the better career/resum? and 3) who would win in a fight between the two at 126?! (prime vs prime)
This is my first ever thread so excuse me for any beginner errors. I apologise in advance and hopefully I'll get the hang of it.
I recently went through my top 5 'pound for pound' of all times list with some friends. I had Ray Robinson at the top of the pile with Harry Greb relatively close in second place. Muhammad Ali went in at 5th place which left me struggling to place Willie Pep and Henry Armstrong. I eventually went with Henry as third greatest of all time leaving Willie in 4th.
My question is who do you think was the 1) better boxer/fighter 2) who had the better career/resum? and 3) who would win in a fight between the two at 126?! (prime vs prime)
Comment