Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sonny Liston would dominate if he fought today!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Hold on, I missed something Ray,

    You claimed "Ray Robinson" was your finest example?

    Boy!

    Robinson is special, because he compiled the most extensive good record in all of boxing of all time.

    But that's where it ends.

    Robinson had very poor defence. Robinson was basically, a PUNCHER, he was by todays standards, no technical stylist.

    When Robinson fought LaMotta, he sometimes LOST and he always STRUGGLED!

    LaMotta was 1/5th the fighter Hagler was, who is only 1/2 the fighter Alvarez is. Yet Leonard BEAT Hagler. Floyd completely shut Canelo out, punched him til he was red in the face with both swelling AND embarrassment!

    You might win a lot of friends with such a statement but for an OBJECTIVE listener, to slam someone like Floyd technically and THEN promote Robinson, you've just exposed yourself to criticism!

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by Elroy1 View Post
      Hold on, I missed something Ray,

      You claimed "Ray Robinson" was your finest example?

      Boy!

      Robinson is special, because he compiled the most extensive good record in all of boxing of all time.

      But that's where it ends.

      Robinson had very poor defence. Robinson was basically, a PUNCHER, he was by todays standards, no technical stylist.

      When Robinson fought LaMotta, he sometimes LOST and he always STRUGGLED!

      LaMotta was 1/5th the fighter Hagler was, who is only 1/2 the fighter Alvarez is. Yet Leonard BEAT Hagler. Floyd completely shut Canelo out, punched him til he was red in the face with both swelling AND embarrassment!

      You might win a lot of friends with such a statement but for an OBJECTIVE listener, to slam someone like Floyd technically and THEN promote Robinson, you've just exposed yourself to criticism!

      Hagler is 1/2 the fighter canelo is?

      Now I've heard it all

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
        Hagler is 1/2 the fighter canelo is?

        Now I've heard it all
        It's like he's just saying it for shock value. I'm done taking the bait and I hope that the moderators will put a stop to the pollution.

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by Scott9945 View Post
          It's like he's just saying it for shock value. I'm done taking the bait and I hope that the moderators will put a stop to the pollution.
          Shock value? Pollution? Banning for having an opinion based on real evidence instead of heresay?

          You know what Scott, don't worry about my words. Take a look at this short clip. And I mean REALLY look.



          I made the comparisons because Alvarez, Hagler and LaMotta were all strong guys with great chin and power for their classes.

          Have you seen Hagler perform anything as sharp as this? Have you seen LaMotta capable of anything close to this?

          This is mitts, I am aware, but mitts are a very modern tool which makes fighters much sharper. What evidence do you bring, except insults.

          Comment


            #65
            I don't care about this anymore, I'm done with goating and baiting I have never associated with azzholes in my life!
            This was my business for much longer than this jack off has been alive.

            DONE!! Ban this troll ***** and get it over with!

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Elroy1 View Post
              but mitts are a very modern tool which makes fighters much sharper.
              Pads have been around since the 1950's. They weren't used as trainers believed they had limited teaching use.

              They were originally used to work on a boxers flaw when executing a specific punch. They would then go back to the heavy bag and continue their training.

              "They have fighters punch the hand pads - pop, pop, pop - and they put on a show and make a lot of noise that's impressive to the crowd and the media guys. But it's just a show for the most part. Very little is actually being taught."

              Emmanuel Steward

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by Elroy1 View Post
                Hold on, I missed something Ray,

                You claimed "Ray Robinson" was your finest example?

                Boy!

                Robinson is special, because he compiled the most extensive good record in all of boxing of all time.

                But that's where it ends.

                Robinson had very poor defence. Robinson was basically, a PUNCHER, he was by todays standards, no technical stylist.

                When Robinson fought LaMotta, he sometimes LOST and he always STRUGGLED!

                LaMotta was 1/5th the fighter Hagler was, who is only 1/2 the fighter Alvarez is. Yet Leonard BEAT Hagler. Floyd completely shut Canelo out, punched him til he was red in the face with both swelling AND embarrassment!

                You might win a lot of friends with such a statement but for an OBJECTIVE listener, to slam someone like Floyd technically and THEN promote Robinson, you've just exposed yourself to criticism!
                And there we have it. The point of no return.

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by Elroy1 View Post
                  Shock value? Pollution? Banning for having an opinion based on real evidence instead of heresay?

                  You know what Scott, don't worry about my words. Take a look at this short clip. And I mean REALLY look.



                  I made the comparisons because Alvarez, Hagler and LaMotta were all strong guys with great chin and power for their classes.

                  Have you seen Hagler perform anything as sharp as this? Have you seen LaMotta capable of anything close to this?

                  This is mitts, I am aware, but mitts are a very modern tool which makes fighters much sharper. What evidence do you bring, except insults.
                  Audley Harrison vs Sonny Liston who ya got?

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by Caught Square View Post
                    Audley Harrison vs Sonny Liston who ya got?
                    That's a tough one. Audley Harrison has beat great fighters such as Danny Williams and hung tough with ATGs such as David Haye and Deontay Wilder.

                    What did Sonny Liston ever do? He got smoked by a light-fisted cruiserweight by the name of Cassius Clay and struggled against bums such as Zora Folley and Cleveland Williams

                    His only recognition is beating Floyd Patterson - a scared, blown up light-heavy weight.

                    /sarc

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by Elroy1 View Post
                      Shock value? Pollution? Banning for having an opinion based on real evidence instead of heresay?

                      You know what Scott, don't worry about my words. Take a look at this short clip. And I mean REALLY look.



                      I made the comparisons because Alvarez, Hagler and LaMotta were all strong guys with great chin and power for their classes.

                      Have you seen Hagler perform anything as sharp as this? Have you seen LaMotta capable of anything close to this?

                      This is mitts, I am aware, but mitts are a very modern tool which makes fighters much sharper. What evidence do you bring, except insults.
                      I learned a long time ago that when the *******s want to demonstrate in Skolkie ( a ***ish neighborhood) when the religious zealots want to go to a good soldgers funeral with signs saying he will burn in hell....It tests all our patience and as hard as it is, all of us, Ray included, have to learn that free speech needs bad people, idiots and other assorted near do wells, to test it at all times.

                      I don't support banning you but I do think it is high time you understand what you really do here, all humor aside:

                      a) you piss off people who contribute real knowledge.

                      b) You never present any evidence of your assertions. That is why they are trolling. You claim there is evidence and then claim others do not present evidence when in fact, you virtually NEVER present any proof of your contrarian points of view. have you ever heard of the saying "extraordinary assertions require extraordinary proof" If you want to say something so inflammatory as what you are saying on this thread then present proof of your assertion

                      c) because otherwise you are simply being inflammatory.

                      d) Again, I don't support banning. I do think that there should be consequences in this section when someone is unwilling to give a basis for extraordinary opinions.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP