Originally posted by poet682006
View Post
Why are you so threatened by common sense? What is so difficult to understand about this?
If you beat Leonard, that's great. If you turn right around and quit against Leonard in the second fight and put up zero effort until the last round in the third fight ... that sort of takes away from the accomplishment of the first fight.
You spend eight years dominating at Lightweight, and you spend 20 years stinking out the joint ... and humiliating yourself in public. That 20 years of mediocrity and embarrassment tarnishes the parade of the other accomplishments.
It's the old one step forward, two steps back principle.
Contrast him to someone like Carlos Monzon or Hagler, who went out losing his title in controversial fashion and never came back, never spent decades losing to the likes of Frank Tate and Chris Eubank. Never showed up bloated and out of shape and quit against some journeyman like Sanderline Williams -- thanks to a punch to the armpit.
There's something to be said for fighters who reach the top, fight the best, and then get the hell out. Their overall careers are more impressive historically than people who are solid for a period and suck the majority of the time (like Duran). It's fine if you remember him when he was on top, but if you have to spend two decades telling people he used to be a lot better than the fat tub of goo boring everyone to death they are currently watching ... at some point the bad years level out the good. And it's not fair to the guys who didn't stink out the joint to rate the guy who ****** the majority of his career ahead of them.
That's all.
Comment