I put 'very' in the title as it seems that every close fight is considered controversial these days.
For me it would be Cotto-Corley, which the majority of people felt was stopped too soon.
The HBO commentary team described it as 'disgraceful' and 'a hometown stoppage'. I personally had no problem with it. Corley was under pressure and took a knee, then got up and dodged a couple of Cotto's punches before taking another knee without even being hit.
IMO if a boxer takes a knee twice in one round, especially without even taking a punch, then the ref is right to call it off.
The only judges' decision that comes to mind is MAB-Morales 2. That doesn't really count as I've never scored it round by round, but my general impression was that Barrera did a good job of nullifying EM's offense by controlling range well and outboxed him for most of the fight. From what I've seen elsewhere, it seems that a large number of people regard this as a bad decision.
For me it would be Cotto-Corley, which the majority of people felt was stopped too soon.
The HBO commentary team described it as 'disgraceful' and 'a hometown stoppage'. I personally had no problem with it. Corley was under pressure and took a knee, then got up and dodged a couple of Cotto's punches before taking another knee without even being hit.
IMO if a boxer takes a knee twice in one round, especially without even taking a punch, then the ref is right to call it off.
The only judges' decision that comes to mind is MAB-Morales 2. That doesn't really count as I've never scored it round by round, but my general impression was that Barrera did a good job of nullifying EM's offense by controlling range well and outboxed him for most of the fight. From what I've seen elsewhere, it seems that a large number of people regard this as a bad decision.
Comment