i had an argument today over this, i believe manpac is better and ill tell you why
no one took the boxing world by storm like tyson, but thats all out of the ring.....tyson beat mediocre opposition and past prime fighters....tell me how koing a scared michael spinks is any better than manpac koing a shot hatton....ive got more confidence that manpac dominating hatton on his best day than tyson of spinks.....
tyson did unify the hw titles by himself tho which is something i believe manpac never did, at least when moving up in weight the past few years...manpac has at least been highly competitive in his losses to superior boxers unlike tyson....
manpac is also better mentally he hasnt let the glory get to him like tyson, whos fans make excuses for him being outta his prime when he lost at 25....
no one took the boxing world by storm like tyson, but thats all out of the ring.....tyson beat mediocre opposition and past prime fighters....tell me how koing a scared michael spinks is any better than manpac koing a shot hatton....ive got more confidence that manpac dominating hatton on his best day than tyson of spinks.....
tyson did unify the hw titles by himself tho which is something i believe manpac never did, at least when moving up in weight the past few years...manpac has at least been highly competitive in his losses to superior boxers unlike tyson....
manpac is also better mentally he hasnt let the glory get to him like tyson, whos fans make excuses for him being outta his prime when he lost at 25....
Comment