Originally posted by The Underboss
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Punching Power Debate : Mike Tyson v.s George Foreman
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Southpaw Stinger View PostNot better, just more raw power.
Foreman, Shavers even Bruno had more raw punching power than Mike Tyson but Tyson's punches were quicker, more accurate and came together in bunches, therefore in summary Tyson was a better technical hitter but Foreman had more punching power.
Comment
-
Originally posted by VERSATILE2K7 View PostBy the way,you guys do know that Tyson himself said that Foreman hit harder right? I just wanted to clear that up.
PS. Don't underestimate young Foreman's straight ahead speed: You blink and he was on you like stink on ****. Straight ahead Foreman was a cobra.
Poet
Comment
-
Oh. As a side note I believe Foreman still holds the Heavyweight record for career knockout percentage and this despite not recording a single KO after Michael Moorer. Whether you're judging by pure power or punching effectiveness that record shows Foreman was pretty damn effective.
And some nitwit was comparing Tyson's KO of Berbick favorably over Foreman's KO of Frazier. I'll make this VERY simple: Berbick has no right to be used in the same sentence as Frazier. Frazier was an all-time-great, Berbick was a journeyman at best. There is absolutely NO comparison.
Poet
Comment
-
Originally posted by poet682006 View PostI don't doubt it Versi. Mike always had better knowledge of past fighters than any fighter I've heard of. That's where my respect for Tyson comes from: HIS respect for Boxing, it's history, and the fighters that came before him.
PS. Don't underestimate young Foreman's straight ahead speed: You blink and he was on you like stink on ****. Straight ahead Foreman was a cobra.
Poet
He says it at 4:33 of the video.
Comment
-
Comment