Your lack on depth in terms of boxing history is striking. Norton was termed the uncrowned champion after his highly controversial loss to Ali in 76. He was thought to be Ali’s superior and the rightful worlds hwt champion. (This has nothing to do with handing him a belt). As such Holmes win over Norton was a big deal as Ken was universally thought of as No 1. You put together this Herculean win which showed Larry’s ATG will to win which few fighters possess, his win over Shavers and his win over unretired Ali and you have the reasons Holmes is considered the true worlds champion Post Ali and up to his loss to Spinks.
Another point you miss, and you miss so many, is that ALL historians rate Holmes as a top ten ATG. You are obviously missing something. Actually you’re missing plenty!
Further regarding your last comments in another thread Lewis was worlds hwt champion when he fought Tyson. He had rewon the championship by koing Rachman. Lewis originally won that championship when he koed Briggs years prior.
Ruiz was never worlds hwt champion at any point in time.
Another point you miss, and you miss so many, is that ALL historians rate Holmes as a top ten ATG. You are obviously missing something. Actually you’re missing plenty!
Further regarding your last comments in another thread Lewis was worlds hwt champion when he fought Tyson. He had rewon the championship by koing Rachman. Lewis originally won that championship when he koed Briggs years prior.
Ruiz was never worlds hwt champion at any point in time.
Comment