Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Larry Holmes or Joe Louis

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Larry Holmes or Joe Louis

    Both of these legends had 20+ title matches in thier career. Who fought the harder competition in your opinion?

    I am a huge Foreman fan but isn't it ironic that he returned as soon as Holmes retired? I mean a fight between foreman and holmes would have drawn alot of money if it happened between 1980-84.

    #2
    Originally posted by brownpimp88 View Post
    Both of these legends had 20+ title matches in thier career. Who fought the harder competition in your opinion?

    I am a huge Foreman fan but isn't it ironic that he returned as soon as Holmes retired? I mean a fight between foreman and holmes would have drawn alot of money if it happened between 1980-84.
    Who had the most competition? Hmm I'd have to say Louis, but it's really hard to say. Holmes had Norton from Spinks. Louis had Baer to Walcott. I'd say it depends on who you favor more as a fighter. For me it's Louis.

    Comment


      #3
      My top 5 of all time are:
      ali
      louis
      holmes
      foreman
      marciano

      Larry Holmes is so underrated, if had wins like teofilo stevenson and foreman on his list, he would prolly be #1.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by brownpimp88 View Post
        My top 5 of all time are:
        ali
        louis
        holmes
        foreman
        marciano

        Larry Holmes is so underrated, if had wins like teofilo stevenson and foreman on his list, he would prolly be #1.
        if tyson defeated lewis, holyfield and vitali he would be up there too!

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Lubutheimmortal View Post
          Who had the most competition? Hmm I'd have to say Louis, but it's really hard to say. Holmes had Norton from Spinks. Louis had Baer to Walcott. I'd say it depends on who you favor more as a fighter. For me it's Louis.

          I met Holmes several times and I agree that he was underrated, BUT here's what I have:

          Louis fought 51 opponents, out of 71, that were at one time or another rated in the top 10. That's a percentage of 76.056%.

          Holmes fought 35 opponents, out of 75, that were at one time or another rated in the top 10. That's a percentage of 46.67%.

          Louis fought opponents that had an average record of 38.1-10.2-2.6
          Holmes fought opponents that had an average record of 19.85-5.1-0.67

          So I would say that Louis fought the better competition.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by hhascup View Post
            I met Holmes several times and I agree that he was underrated, BUT here's what I have:

            Louis fought 51 opponents, out of 71, that were at one time or another rated in the top 10. That's a percentage of 76.056%.

            Holmes fought 35 opponents, out of 75, that were at one time or another rated in the top 10. That's a percentage of 46.67%.

            Louis fought opponents that had an average record of 38.1-10.2-2.6
            Holmes fought opponents that had an average record of 19.85-5.1-0.67

            So I would say that Louis fought the better competition.
            Your numbers seem to speak above opinion, and thanks for clearing that question up for me because I'd been thinking about it since I made that post. I am glad my gutt feeling to follow Joe Louis was accurate.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by hhascup View Post
              I met Holmes several times and I agree that he was underrated, BUT here's what I have:

              Louis fought 51 opponents, out of 71, that were at one time or another rated in the top 10. That's a percentage of 76.056%.

              Holmes fought 35 opponents, out of 75, that were at one time or another rated in the top 10. That's a percentage of 46.67%.

              Louis fought opponents that had an average record of 38.1-10.2-2.6
              Holmes fought opponents that had an average record of 19.85-5.1-0.67

              So I would say that Louis fought the better competition.
              Joe's competition was certainly more experienced as 9 of Larry's title defences came against guys with fewer than 20 wins with 7 having fewer than 20 fights.
              Last edited by SABBATH; 12-26-2006, 12:19 PM.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Lubutheimmortal View Post
                Your numbers seem to speak above opinion, and thanks for clearing that question up for me because I'd been thinking about it since I made that post. I am glad my gutt feeling to follow Joe Louis was accurate.
                Yes, I go by the facts. I have been in boxing since I was a kid and I have been doing research almost as long. I have won thousands of sport trivia contests on all sports. I have even done research with Herb Goldman and have talked about boxing history and trivia with Bert Sugar, who I was with last week and he sent me a book on the history of the New York Golden Gloves.

                One boxing trivia site calls it "Boxing trivia Boxing quizzes, trivia, facts, home of the trivia king hhascup."

                Comment


                  #9
                  I don't always go by facts because typicaly along the lines there are screw up calls and stuff like that. I go by what I see, read, adn know. Larry's competion was stronger IMO, but Louis's was more experienced. So I won't make a decision yet.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Louis has the better resume definetely.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP